mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Random at First, Fast at Last: NTK-Guided Fourier Pre-Processing for Tabular DL

arXiv 2506.02406 ↗First posted 3 Jun 2025cs.LG cs.AI stat.MLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

While random Fourier features are a classic tool in kernel methods, their utility as a pre-processing step for deep learning on tabular data has been largely overlooked. Motivated by shortcomings in tabular deep learning pipelines - revealed through Neural Tangent Kernel (NTK) analysis - we revisit and repurpose random Fourier mappings as a parameter-free, architecture-agnostic transformation. By projecting each input into a fixed feature space via sine and cosine projections with frequencies drawn once at initialization, this approach circumvents the need for ad hoc normalization or additional learnable embeddings. We show within the NTK framework that this mapping (i) bounds and conditions the network's initial NTK spectrum, and (ii) introduces a bias that shortens the optimization trajectory, thereby accelerating gradient-based training. These effects pre-condition the network with a stable kernel from the outset. Empirically, we demonstrate that deep networks trained on Fourier-transformed inputs converge more rapidly and consistently achieve strong final performance, often with fewer epochs and less hyperparameter tuning. Our findings establish random Fourier pre-processing as a theoretically motivated, plug-and-play enhancement for tabular deep learning.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Jun 2025.

Builds on

27 of 41 references.

References · 27

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2018Neural Tangent Kernel: Convergence and Generalization in Neural Networkscited by 2,597
  3. 2021Revisiting Deep Learning Models for Tabular Datacited by 725
  4. 2019TabNet: Attentive Interpretable Tabular Learningcited by 640
  5. 2024KAN: Kolmogorov-Arnold Networkscited by 634
  6. 2017Self-Normalizing Neural Networkscited by 591
  7. 2020TabTransformer: Tabular Data Modeling Using Contextual Embeddingscited by 398
  8. 2020TaBERT: Pretraining for Joint Understanding of Textual and Tabular Datacited by 395
  9. 2021SAINT: Improved Neural Networks for Tabular Data via Row Attention and Contrastive Pre-Trainingcited by 310
  10. 2022TabLLM: Few-shot Classification of Tabular Data with Large Language Modelscited by 273
  11. 2019Neural Oblivious Decision Ensembles for Deep Learning on Tabular Datacited by 200
  12. 2022On Embeddings for Numerical Features in Tabular Deep Learningcited by 185
15 more
  1. 2021SCARF: Self-Supervised Contrastive Learning using Random Feature Corruptioncited by 151
  2. 2013Introducing LETOR 4.0 Datasetscited by 120
  3. 2021Neural Networks as Kernel Learners: The Silent Alignment Effectcited by 106
  4. 2020The Neural Tangent Kernel in High Dimensions: Triple Descent and a Multi-Scale Theory of Generalizationcited by 101
  5. 2024Better by Default: Strong Pre-Tuned MLPs and Boosted Trees on Tabular Datacited by 87
  6. 2015On the Error of Random Fourier Featurescited by 76
  7. 2023TabR: Tabular Deep Learning Meets Nearest Neighbors in 2023cited by 73
  8. 2020The Tree Ensemble Layer: Differentiability meets Conditional Computationcited by 57
  9. 2020Every Model Learned by Gradient Descent Is Approximately a Kernel Machinecited by 53
  10. 2024SwitchTab: Switched Autoencoders Are Effective Tabular Learnerscited by 37
  11. 2024PTaRL: Prototype-based Tabular Representation Learning via Space Calibrationcited by 27
  12. 2023ReConTab: Regularized Contrastive Representation Learning for Tabular Datacited by 24
  13. 2022Neural Tangent Kernel: A Surveycited by 22
  14. 2020Abstract Neural Networkscited by 11
  15. 2024Deep Learning Through A Telescoping Lens: A Simple Model Provides Empirical Insights On Grokking, Gradient Boosting & Beyondcited by 9

Built on by

Not cited yet.