SMOTE-DP: Improving Privacy-Utility Tradeoff with Synthetic Data
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Privacy-preserving data publication, including synthetic data sharing, often experiences trade-offs between privacy and utility. Synthetic data is generally more effective than data anonymization in balancing this trade-off, however, not without its own challenges. Synthetic data produced by generative models trained on source data may inadvertently reveal information about outliers. Techniques specifically designed for preserving privacy, such as introducing noise to satisfy differential privacy, often incur unpredictable and significant losses in utility. In this work we show that, with the right mechanism of synthetic data generation, we can achieve strong privacy protection without significant utility loss. Synthetic data generators producing contracting data patterns, such as Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique (SMOTE), can enhance a differentially private data generator, leveraging the strengths of both. We prove in theory and through empirical demonstration that this SMOTE-DP technique can produce synthetic data that not only ensures robust privacy protection but maintains utility in downstream learning tasks.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Jun 2025.
Builds on
8 of 44 references.
References · 8
- 2016Membership Inference Attacks against Machine Learning Modelscited by 2,281
- 2019Modeling Tabular data using Conditional GANcited by 699
- 2017Renyi Differential Privacycited by 650
- 2018ML-Leaks: Model and Data Independent Membership Inference Attacks and Defenses on Machine Learning Modelscited by 498
- 2020Synthetic Data -- Anonymisation Groundhog Daycited by 108
- 2021Bias in Machine Learning Software: Why? How? What to do?cited by 93
- 2017Knock Knock, Who's There? Membership Inference on Aggregate Location Datacited by 70
- 2019Local Differential Privacy for Deep Learningcited by 46
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.