Robust Satisficing Gaussian Process Bandits Under Adversarial Attacks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We address the problem of Gaussian Process (GP) optimization in the presence of unknown and potentially varying adversarial perturbations. Unlike traditional robust optimization approaches that focus on maximizing performance under worst-case scenarios, we consider a robust satisficing objective, where the goal is to consistently achieve a predefined performance threshold τ, even under adversarial conditions. We propose two novel algorithms based on distinct formulations of robust satisficing, and show that they are instances of a general robust satisficing framework. Further, each algorithm offers different guarantees depending on the nature of the adversary. Specifically, we derive two regret bounds: one that is sublinear over time, assuming certain conditions on the adversary and the satisficing threshold τ, and another that scales with the perturbation magnitude but requires no assumptions on the adversary. Through extensive experiments, we demonstrate that our approach outperforms the established robust optimization methods in achieving the satisficing objective, particularly when the ambiguity set of the robust optimization framework is inaccurately specified.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Jun 2025.
Builds on
24 of 43 references.
References · 24
- 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,155
- 2020WILDS: A Benchmark of in-the-Wild Distribution Shiftscited by 1,375
- 2017A Tutorial on Thompson Samplingcited by 433
- 2017On Kernelized Multi-armed Banditscited by 352
- 2020On Information Gain and Regret Bounds in Gaussian Process Banditscited by 158
- 2014Towards Deep Neural Network Architectures Robust to Adversarial Examplescited by 146
- 2018Adversarially Robust Optimization with Gaussian Processescited by 62
- 2020Distributionally Robust Bayesian Optimizationcited by 61
- 2021Practical and Rigorous Uncertainty Bounds for Gaussian Process Regressioncited by 49
- 2018Satisficing in Time-Sensitive Bandit Learningcited by 39
- 2017Virtual vs. Real: Trading Off Simulations and Physical Experiments in Reinforcement Learning with Bayesian Optimizationcited by 34
- 2020Corruption-Tolerant Gaussian Process Bandit Optimizationcited by 34
12 more
- 2016Automatic LQR Tuning Based on Gaussian Process Global Optimizationcited by 30
- 2017Practical Bayesian optimization in the presence of outlierscited by 25
- 2020Noisy-Input Entropy Search for Efficient Robust Bayesian Optimizationcited by 24
- 2018AutoPrognosis: Automated Clinical Prognostic Modeling via Bayesian Optimization with Structured Kernel Learningcited by 22
- 2021Value-at-Risk Optimization with Gaussian Processescited by 20
- 2019Bayesian optimisation under uncertain inputscited by 18
- 2020Mean-Variance Analysis in Bayesian Optimization under Uncertaintycited by 18
- 2021Lenient Regret and Good-Action Identification in Gaussian Process Banditscited by 12
- 2022A Robust Phased Elimination Algorithm for Corruption-Tolerant Gaussian Process Banditscited by 11
- 2015Satisficing in multi-armed bandit problemscited by 9
- 2020Lenient Regret for Multi-Armed Banditscited by 8
- 2023Robust Bayesian Satisficingcited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
- 2026Maximally Robust Satisficing Bayesian Optimizationcited by 0
- 2026Maximally Robust Satisficing Bayesian Optimization15 Jul 2026