Class Incremental Learning for Algorithm Selection
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Algorithm selection is commonly used to predict the best solver from a portfolio per per-instance. In many real scenarios, instances arrive in a stream: new instances become available over time, while the number of class labels can also grow as new data distributions arrive downstream. As a result, the classification model needs to be periodically updated to reflect additional solvers without catastrophic forgetting of past data. In machine-learning (ML), this is referred to as Class Incremental Learning (CIL). While commonly addressed in ML settings, its relevance to algorithm-selection in optimisation has not been previously studied. Using a bin-packing dataset, we benchmark 8 continual learning methods with respect to their ability to withstand catastrophic forgetting. We find that rehearsal-based methods significantly outperform other CIL methods. While there is evidence of forgetting, the loss is small at around 7%. Hence, these methods appear to be a viable approach to continual learning in streaming optimisation scenarios.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 18 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Jun 2025.
Builds on
7 of 18 references.
References · 7
- 2016Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networkscited by 4,787
- 2016Learning without Forgettingcited by 2,496
- 2017Gradient Episodic Memory for Continual Learningcited by 1,898
- 2018Continual Lifelong Learning with Neural Networks: A Reviewcited by 1,330
- 2017Memory Aware Synapses: Learning what (not) to forgetcited by 1,105
- 2018Efficient Lifelong Learning with A-GEMcited by 1,058
- 2018Automated Algorithm Selection: Survey and Perspectivescited by 114
Built on by
Not cited yet.