mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

CoRE: Condition-based Reasoning for Identifying Outcome Variance in Complex Events

arXiv 2506.01253 ↗First posted 2 Jun 2025cs.CLcited by 1

On the map: LLM reasoning → Causal reasoning in LLMs

Abstract (arXiv)

Knowing which latent conditions lead to a particular outcome is useful for critically examining claims made about complex event outcomes. Identifying implied conditions and examining their influence on an outcome is challenging. We handle this by combining and augmenting annotations from two existing datasets consisting of goals and states, and explore the influence of conditions through our research questions and Condition-based Reasoning tasks. We examine open and closed LLMs of varying sizes and intent-alignment on our reasoning tasks and find that conditions are useful when not all context is available. Models differ widely in their ability to generate and identify outcome-variant conditions which affects their performance on outcome validation when conditions are used to replace missing context. Larger models like GPT-4o, are more cautious in such less constrained situations.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Causal reasoning in LLMs, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 2 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Jun 2025.

Builds on

2 of 43 references.

References · 2

  1. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
  2. 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,459

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025What Defines Good Reasoning in LLMs? Dissecting Reasoning Steps with Multi-Aspect Evaluation
  2. 2026RGDT-Bench: Benchmarking LLM Reasoning for Rule-Governed Decisions and Their Justifications
  3. 2025Measuring Reasoning Utility in LLMs via Conditional Entropy Reduction
  4. 2025Beyond Safe Answers: A Benchmark for Evaluating True Risk Awareness in Large Reasoning Models
  5. 2025Defending the Hierarchical Result Models of Precedential Constraint
  6. 2024Evaluating Interventional Reasoning Capabilities of Large Language Models
  7. 2026Reasoning Models Are Accurate but Unsound on Identification
  8. 2025OpenEstimate: Evaluating LLMs on Reasoning Under Uncertainty with Real-World Data