Rethinking Neural-based Matrix Inversion: Why can't, and Where can
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Deep neural networks have achieved substantial success across various scientific computing tasks. A pivotal challenge within this domain is the rapid and parallel approximation of matrix inverses, critical for numerous applications. Despite significant progress, there currently exists no universal neural-based method for approximating matrix inversion. This paper presents a theoretical analysis demonstrating the fundamental limitations of neural networks in developing a general matrix inversion model. We expand the class of Lipschitz functions to encompass a wider array of neural network models, thereby refining our theoretical approach. Moreover, we delineate specific conditions under which neural networks can effectively approximate matrix inverses. Our theoretical results are supported by experimental results from diverse matrix datasets, exploring the efficacy of neural networks in addressing the matrix inversion challenge.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 May 2025.
Builds on
8 of 33 references.
References · 8
- 2016SGDR: Stochastic Gradient Descent with Warm Restartscited by 5,045
- 2019Neural Spline Flowscited by 596
- 2018Lipschitz regularity of deep neural networks: analysis and efficient estimationcited by 415
- 2018Sorting out Lipschitz function approximationcited by 213
- 2020The Lipschitz Constant of Self-Attentioncited by 174
- 2020Lipschitz constant estimation of Neural Networks via sparse polynomial optimizationcited by 87
- 2020Solving high-dimensional eigenvalue problems using deep neural networks: A diffusion Monte Carlo like approachcited by 35
- 2022AUTM Flow: Atomic Unrestricted Time Machine for Monotonic Normalizing Flowscited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.