CRScore++: Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Tool and AI Feedback for Code Review
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Reinforcement learning (RL) to improve code review comment generation requires handling unstructured outputs, making reinforcement learning (RL) feedback challenging. The two main RL approaches, namely RL with Verifiable Feedback (RLVR) and RL with AI Feedback (RLAIF), offer trade-offs: RLVR provides reliable feedback for structured tasks like code generation, while RLAIF works for unstructured outputs but is subjective. We bridge this gap with CRScore++, an RL framework that leverages both LLM-based subjective feedback and verifiable signals for training. Extending CRScore, a code review evaluation metric integrating LLMs with verifiers like linters and code smell detectors, CRScore++ transforms these signals into training rewards. We show that CRScore++ improves a weaker student model through a combination of supervised fine-tuning and RL critique from a stronger teacher model, thus enabling generalization to novel programming languages.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 30 May 2025.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
3 papers.
- 2026AACR-Bench: Evaluating Automatic Code Review with Holistic Repository-Level Context27 Jan 2026
- 2025From Code Foundation Models to Agents and Applications: A Comprehensive Survey and Practical Guide to Code Intelligence23 Nov 2025
- 2025MetaLint: Easy-to-Hard Generalization for Code Linting15 Jul 2025