mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

SafeCOMM: A Study on Safety Degradation in Fine-Tuned Telecom Large Language Models

arXiv 2506.00062 ↗First posted 29 May 2025cs.CY cs.CL cs.CRcited by 0

On the map: LLM safety and security → Safety alignment, refusal and guardrails

Abstract (arXiv)

Fine-tuning large language models (LLMs) on telecom datasets is a common practice to adapt general-purpose models to the telecom domain. However, little attention has been paid to how this process may compromise model safety. Recent research has shown that even benign fine-tuning can degrade the safety alignment of LLMs, causing them to respond to harmful or unethical user queries. In this paper, we investigate this issue by fine-tuning LLMs on three representative telecom datasets and show that safety degrades even for light telecom domain adaptation. To this end, we introduce TeleHarm, the first telecom-specific red-teaming benchmark, which we use alongside established DirectHarm and HexPhi datasets to systematically assess harmful behavior. We further extend our analysis to publicly available TeleLLMs that were continually pre-trained on large telecom corpora, revealing that safety alignment is severely lacking, primarily due to the omission of safety-focused instruction tuning. To address these issues, we evaluate three realignment defenses: SafeInstruct, SafeLoRA, SafeMERGE. We show that, across all settings, the proposed defenses can effectively restore safety without compromising telecom task performance, leading to Safe teleCOMMunication (SafeCOMM) models. Our work serves as both a diagnostic study and practical guide for safety realignment in telecom-tuned LLMs, underscoring the need for safety-aware instruction and fine-tuning in the telecom domain.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Safety alignment, refusal and guardrails, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 21 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 May 2025.

Builds on

21 of 25 references.

Closest ancestors · 6

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025SafeMERGE: Preserving Safety Alignment in Fine-Tuned Large Language Models via Selective Layer-Wise Model Merging21 Mar
  2. 2024Harmful Fine-tuning Attacks and Defenses for Large Language Models: A Survey26 Sep
  3. 2024Refusal in Language Models Is Mediated by a Single Direction17 Jun
  4. 2024Safety Alignment Should Be Made More Than Just a Few Tokens Deep10 Jun
  5. 2024What is in Your Safe Data? Identifying Benign Data that Breaks Safety1 Apr
  6. 2023Fine-tuning Aligned Language Models Compromises Safety, Even When Users Do Not Intend To!5 Oct

Other references · 15

  1. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
  2. 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,380
  3. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 13,028
  4. 2024Qwen2 Technical Reportcited by 2,120
  5. 2024Mixtral of Expertscited by 1,823
  6. 2023Instruction Tuning for Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 623
  7. 2023Safety-Tuned LLaMAs: Lessons From Improving the Safety of Large Language Models that Follow Instructionscited by 387
  8. 2023Shadow Alignment: The Ease of Subverting Safely-Aligned Language Modelscited by 297
  9. 2024Safe LoRA: the Silver Lining of Reducing Safety Risks when Fine-tuning Large Language Modelscited by 125
  10. 2024Keeping LLMs Aligned After Fine-tuning: The Crucial Role of Prompt Templatescited by 96
  11. 2023TeleQnA: A Benchmark Dataset to Assess Large Language Models Telecommunications Knowledgecited by 63
  12. 2024Artificial General Intelligence (AGI)-Native Wireless Systems: A Journey Beyond 6Gcited by 31
3 more
  1. 2024TSpec-LLM: An Open-source Dataset for LLM Understanding of 3GPP Specificationscited by 27
  2. 2024Tele-LLMs: A Series of Specialized Large Language Models for Telecommunicationscited by 25
  3. 2024GenAINet: Enabling Wireless Collective Intelligence via Knowledge Transfer and Reasoningcited by 13

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Fine-Tuning Lowers Safety and Disrupts Evaluation Consistency
  2. 2026Safety at One Shot: Patching Fine-Tuned LLMs with A Single Instance
  3. 2026Understanding and Preserving Safety in Fine-Tuned LLMs
  4. 2024Towards Comprehensive Post Safety Alignment of Large Language Models via Safety Patching
  5. 2025Efficiency vs. Alignment: Investigating Safety and Fairness Risks in Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning of LLMs
  6. 2025Picky LLMs and Unreliable RMs: An Empirical Study on Safety Alignment after Instruction Tuning
  7. 2024Separate the Wheat from the Chaff: A Post-Hoc Approach to Safety Re-Alignment for Fine-Tuned Language Models
  8. 2024Locking Down the Finetuned LLMs Safety