Sample-optimal learning of quantum states using gentle measurements
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Gentle measurements of quantum states do not entirely collapse the initial state. Instead, they provide a post-measurement state at a prescribed trace distance α from the initial state together with a random variable used for quantum learning of the initial state. We introduce here the class of α-locally-gentle measurements (α-LGM) on a finite dimensional quantum system which are product measurements on product states and prove a strong quantum Data-Processing Inequality (qDPI) on this class using an improved relation between gentleness and quantum differential privacy. We further show a gentle quantum Neyman-Pearson lemma which implies that our qDPI is asymptotically optimal (for small α). This inequality is employed to show that the necessary number of quantum states for prescribed accuracy ε is of order 1/(ε2 α2) for both quantum tomography and quantum state certification. Finally, we propose an α-LGM called quantum Label Switch that attains these bounds. It is a general implementable method to turn any two-outcome measurement into an α-LGM.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 55 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 May 2025.
Builds on
10 of 55 references.
References · 10
- 2020Predicting Many Properties of a Quantum System from Very Few Measurementscited by 233
- 2021Information-theoretic bounds on quantum advantage in machine learningcited by 96
- 2016Efficient quantum tomography IIcited by 54
- 2021Exponential separations between learning with and without quantum memorycited by 52
- 2022Quantum Differential Privacy: An Information Theory Perspectivecited by 32
- 2023On quantum backpropagation, information reuse, and cheating measurement collapsecited by 32
- 2020Entanglement is Necessary for Optimal Quantum Property Testingcited by 23
- 2021Inference under Information Constraints III: Local Privacy Constraintscited by 13
- 2024Measuring Quantum Information Leakage Under Detection Threatcited by 2
- 2021Multivariate Mean Comparison under Differential Privacycited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.