mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

pyMEAL: A Multi-Encoder Augmentation-Aware-Learning Toolbox for Robust Medical Image Translation

arXiv 2505.24421 ↗First posted 30 May 2025eess.IV cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Medical imaging plays a vital role in clinical diagnosis, yet AI-driven imaging methods remain challenged by patient variability, image artifacts, and limited robustness across acquisition conditions. Although deep learning has advanced medical image analysis, 3D image translation remains hindered by limited training data and variability arising from scanner differences, imaging protocols, and patient motion. Conventional data augmentation typically relies on a single transformation pipeline, overlooking augmentation-specific characteristics and limiting representation learning. To address these challenges, we propose Multi-Encoder Augmentation-Aware Learning (MEAL), which processes multiple augmentation variants through dedicated encoder pathways. Three feature integration strategies are investigated: encoder concatenation (MEAL-CC), fusion layer (MEAL-FL), and an adaptive controller block (MEAL-BD). By dynamically weighting augmentation-specific features before decoding, MEAL-BD preserves complementary representations and improves robustness to clinically relevant variability. We evaluate MEAL using CT-to-T1-weighted MRI translation, a clinically relevant task when MRI is unavailable, contraindicated, or delayed. Across predefined and unseen test datasets, MEAL-BD consistently outperformed competing approaches under both geometric perturbations and standard imaging conditions, achieving higher peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) and structural similarity index measure (SSIM). By prioritizing structural fidelity over perceptual realism, MEAL supports clinical interpretation and downstream image analysis rather than replacing diagnostic MRI, demonstrating that augmentation-aware representation learning improves the robustness and clinical applicability of medical image translation.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 64 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 May 2025.

Builds on

10 of 64 references.

References · 10

  1. 2020What Should Not Be Contrastive in Contrastive Learningcited by 224
  2. 2021Can contrastive learning avoid shortcut solutions?cited by 114
  3. 2023Deep Learning Approaches for Data Augmentation in Medical Imaging: A Reviewcited by 48
  4. 2024Tackling Structural Hallucination in Image Translation with Local Diffusioncited by 21
  5. 2024Slice-Consistent 3D Volumetric Brain CT-to-MRI Translation with 2D Brownian Bridge Diffusion Modelcited by 16
  6. 2022A Survey of Automated Data Augmentation Algorithms for Deep Learning-based Image Classification Taskscited by 12
  7. 2023Tackling Bias in the Dice Similarity Coefficient: Introducing nDSC for White Matter Lesion Segmentationcited by 8
  8. 2023Augmenting Medical Imaging: A Comprehensive Catalogue of 65 Techniques for Enhanced Data Analysiscited by 7
  9. 2023Augmentation-aware Self-supervised Learning with Conditioned Projectorcited by 2
  10. 2025AugWard: Augmentation-Aware Representation Learning for Accurate Graph Classificationcited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.