mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

The Butterfly Effect in Pathology: Exploring Security in Pathology Foundation Models

arXiv 2505.24141 ↗First posted 30 May 2025cs.CV cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

With the widespread adoption of pathology foundation models in both research and clinical decision support systems, exploring their security has become a critical concern. However, despite their growing impact, the vulnerability of these models to adversarial attacks remains largely unexplored. In this work, we present the first systematic investigation into the security of pathology foundation models for whole slide image~(WSI) analysis against adversarial attacks. Specifically, we introduce the principle of textitlocal perturbation with global impact and propose a label-free attack framework that operates without requiring access to downstream task labels. Under this attack framework, we revise four classical white-box attack methods and redefine the perturbation budget based on the characteristics of WSI. We conduct comprehensive experiments on three representative pathology foundation models across five datasets and six downstream tasks. Despite modifying only 0.1% of patches per slide with imperceptible noise, our attack leads to downstream accuracy degradation that can reach up to 20% in the worst cases. Furthermore, we analyze key factors that influence attack success, explore the relationship between patch-level vulnerability and semantic content, and conduct a preliminary investigation into potential defence strategies. These findings lay the groundwork for future research on the adversarial robustness and reliable deployment of pathology foundation models. Our code is publicly available at: https://github.com/Jiashuai-Liu-hmos/Attack-WSI-pathology-foundation-models.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 May 2025.

Builds on

20 of 41 references.

References · 20

  1. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
  2. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
  3. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,155
  4. 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,998
  5. 2018Attention-based Deep Multiple Instance Learningcited by 1,095
  6. 2016Adversarial Machine Learning at Scalecited by 936
  7. 2020Data Efficient and Weakly Supervised Computational Pathology on Whole Slide Imagescited by 745
  8. 2019Adversarial Training for Free!cited by 643
  9. 2021TransMIL: Transformer based Correlated Multiple Instance Learning for Whole Slide Image Classificationcited by 555
  10. 2024Multimodal Whole Slide Foundation Model for Pathologycited by 162
  11. 2024Virchow2: Scaling Self-Supervised Mixed Magnification Models in Pathologycited by 161
  12. 2024PRISM: A Multi-Modal Generative Foundation Model for Slide-Level Histopathologycited by 85
8 more
  1. 2025Accelerating Data Processing and Benchmarking of AI Models for Pathologycited by 65
  2. 2020Guided Adversarial Attack for Evaluating and Enhancing Adversarial Defensescited by 62
  3. 2024A Multimodal Knowledge-enhanced Whole-slide Pathology Foundation Modelcited by 59
  4. 2025Molecular-driven Foundation Model for Oncologic Pathologycited by 55
  5. 2024WSI-LLaVA: A Multimodal Large Language Model for Whole Slide Imagecited by 40
  6. 2023A Foundational Multimodal Vision Language AI Assistant for Human Pathologycited by 21
  7. 2024Demonstration of an Adversarial Attack Against a Multimodal Vision Language Model for Pathology Imagingcited by 10
  8. 2021Performance Evaluation of Adversarial Attacks: Discrepancies and Solutionscited by 7

Built on by

Not cited yet.