mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

AJF: Adaptive Jailbreak Framework Based on the Comprehension Ability of Black-Box Large Language Models

arXiv 2505.23404 ↗First posted 29 May 2025cs.CLcited by 0

On the map: LLM safety and security → Jailbreaking

Abstract (arXiv)

Recent advancements in adversarial jailbreak attacks have exposed critical vulnerabilities in Large Language Models (LLMs), enabling the circumvention of alignment safeguards through increasingly sophisticated prompt manipulations. Our experiments find that the effectiveness of jailbreak strategies is influenced by the comprehension ability of the target LLM. Building on this insight, we propose an Adaptive Jailbreak Framework (AJF) based on the comprehension ability of black-box large language models. Specifically, AJF first categorizes the comprehension ability of the LLM and then applies different strategies accordingly: For models with limited comprehension ability (Type-I LLMs), AJF integrates layered semantic mutations with an encryption technique (MuEn strategy), to more effectively evade the LLM's defenses during the input and inference stages. For models with strong comprehension ability (Type-II LLMs), AJF employs a more complex strategy that builds upon the MuEn strategy by adding an additional layer: inducing the LLM to generate an encrypted response. This forms a dual-end encryption scheme (MuDeEn strategy), further bypassing the LLM's defenses during the output stage. Experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach, achieving attack success rates of 98.9% on GPT-4o (29 May 2025 release) and 99.8% on GPT-4.1 (8 July 2025 release). Our work contributes to a deeper understanding of the vulnerabilities in current LLMs alignment mechanisms.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Jailbreaking, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 18 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 May 2025.

Builds on

18 of 31 references.

Closest ancestors · 12

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024Jailbreaking Large Language Models with Symbolic Mathematics17 Sep
  2. 2024GPT-4 Jailbreaks Itself with Near-Perfect Success Using Self-Explanation21 May
  3. 2024CodeChameleon: Personalized Encryption Framework for Jailbreaking Large Language Models26 Feb
  4. 2023Defending Large Language Models Against Jailbreaking Attacks Through Goal Prioritization15 Nov
  5. 2023A Wolf in Sheep's Clothing: Generalized Nested Jailbreak Prompts can Fool Large Language Models Easily14 Nov
  6. 2023Jailbreaking Black Box Large Language Models in Twenty Queries12 Oct
  7. 2023Catastrophic Jailbreak of Open-source LLMs via Exploiting Generation10 Oct
  8. 2023Multilingual Jailbreak Challenges in Large Language Models10 Oct
  9. 2023GPTFUZZER: Red Teaming Large Language Models with Auto-Generated Jailbreak Prompts19 Sep
  10. 2023GPT-4 Is Too Smart To Be Safe: Stealthy Chat with LLMs via Cipher12 Aug
  11. 2023Universal and Transferable Adversarial Attacks on Aligned Language Models27 Jul
  12. 2023MasterKey: Automated Jailbreak Across Multiple Large Language Model Chatbots16 Jul

Other references · 6

  1. 2023G-Eval: NLG Evaluation using GPT-4 with Better Human Alignmentcited by 2,205
  2. 2023Multi-step Jailbreaking Privacy Attacks on ChatGPTcited by 320
  3. 2023Shadow Alignment: The Ease of Subverting Safely-Aligned Language Modelscited by 284
  4. 2023Unifying the Perspectives of NLP and Software Engineering: A Survey on Language Models for Codecited by 62
  5. 2024Operationalizing a Threat Model for Red-Teaming Large Language Models (LLMs)cited by 44
  6. 2023On the Safety of Open-Sourced Large Language Models: Does Alignment Really Prevent Them From Being Misused?cited by 25

Built on by

Not cited yet.