Multipath cycleGAN for harmonization of paired and unpaired low-dose lung computed tomography reconstruction kernels
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Reconstruction kernels in computed tomography (CT) affect spatial resolution and noise characteristics, introducing systematic variability in quantitative imaging measurements such as emphysema quantification. Choosing an appropriate kernel is therefore essential for consistent quantitative analysis. We propose a multipath cycleGAN model for CT kernel harmonization, trained on a mixture of paired and unpaired data from a low-dose lung cancer screening cohort. The model features domain-specific encoders and decoders with a shared latent space and uses discriminators tailored for each domain.We train the model on 42 kernel combinations using 100 scans each from seven representative kernels in the National Lung Screening Trial (NLST) dataset. To evaluate performance, 240 scans from each kernel are harmonized to a reference soft kernel, and emphysema is quantified before and after harmonization. A general linear model assesses the impact of age, sex, smoking status, and kernel on emphysema. We also evaluate harmonization from soft kernels to a reference hard kernel. To assess anatomical consistency, we compare segmentations of lung vessels, muscle, and subcutaneous adipose tissue generated by TotalSegmentator between harmonized and original images. Our model is benchmarked against traditional and switchable cycleGANs. For paired kernels, our approach reduces bias in emphysema scores, as seen in Bland-Altman plots (p<0.05). For unpaired kernels, harmonization eliminates confounding differences in emphysema (p>0.05). High Dice scores confirm preservation of muscle and fat anatomy, while lung vessel overlap remains reasonable. Overall, our shared latent space multipath cycleGAN enables robust harmonization across paired and unpaired CT kernels, improving emphysema quantification and preserving anatomical fidelity.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 58 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 May 2025.
Builds on
13 of 58 references.
References · 13
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
- 2016Image-to-Image Translation with Conditional Adversarial Networkscited by 4,527
- 2016Perceptual Losses for Real-Time Style Transfer and Super-Resolutioncited by 2,694
- 2016Least Squares Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 1,001
- 2015Accurate Image Super-Resolution Using Very Deep Convolutional Networkscited by 903
- 2022TotalSegmentator: robust segmentation of 104 anatomical structures in CT imagescited by 613
- 2021Image-to-Image Translation: Methods and Applicationscited by 116
- 2018Distribution Matching Losses Can Hallucinate Features in Medical Image Translationcited by 99
- 2017Automatic calcium scoring in low-dose chest CT using deep neural networks with dilated convolutionscited by 9
- 2021CT Image Harmonization for Enhancing Radiomics Studiescited by 9
- 2020Continuous Conversion of CT Kernel using Switchable CycleGAN with AdaINcited by 8
- 2021Cross-Vendor CT Image Data Harmonization Using CVH-CTcited by 8
Built on by
Not cited yet.