Optimizing Data Augmentation through Bayesian Model Selection
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Data Augmentation (DA) has become an essential tool to improve robustness and generalization of modern machine learning. However, when deciding on DA strategies it is critical to choose parameters carefully, and this can be a daunting task which is traditionally left to trial-and-error or expensive optimization based on validation performance. In this paper, we counter these limitations by proposing a novel framework for optimizing DA. In particular, we take a probabilistic view of DA, which leads to the interpretation of augmentation parameters as model (hyper)-parameters, and the optimization of the marginal likelihood with respect to these parameters as a Bayesian model selection problem. Due to its intractability, we derive a tractable ELBO, which allows us to optimize augmentation parameters jointly with model parameters. We provide extensive theoretical results on variational approximation quality, generalization guarantees, invariance properties, and connections to empirical Bayes. Through experiments on computer vision and NLP tasks, we show that our approach improves calibration and yields robust performance over fixed or no augmentation. Our work provides a rigorous foundation for optimizing DA through Bayesian principles with significant potential for robust machine learning.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 48 of its 67 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 May 2025.
Builds on
48 of 67 references.
References · 48
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,183
- 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,448
- 2019DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lightercited by 4,307
- 2019CutMix: Regularization Strategy to Train Strong Classifiers with Localizable Featurescited by 2,884
- 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,877
- 2016Categorical Reparameterization with Gumbel-Softmaxcited by 2,739
- 2019RandAugment: Practical automated data augmentation with a reduced search spacecited by 2,269
- 2016Understanding deep learning requires rethinking generalizationcited by 1,674
- 2019AugMix: A Simple Data Processing Method to Improve Robustness and Uncertaintycited by 901
- 2017Computing Nonvacuous Generalization Bounds for Deep (Stochastic) Neural Networks with Many More Parameters than Training Datacited by 533
- 2020Bayesian Deep Learning and a Probabilistic Perspective of Generalizationcited by 480
36 more
- 2021A Survey of Data Augmentation Approaches for NLPcited by 409
- 2021Laplace Redux -- Effortless Bayesian Deep Learningcited by 365
- 2021What Are Bayesian Neural Network Posteriors Really Like?cited by 308
- 2019Fast AutoAugmentcited by 243
- 2021User-friendly introduction to PAC-Bayes boundscited by 239
- 2020Being Bayesian, Even Just a Bit, Fixes Overconfidence in ReLU Networkscited by 231
- 2021Accounting for Variance in Machine Learning Benchmarkscited by 201
- 2019Population Based Augmentation: Efficient Learning of Augmentation Policy Schedulescited by 154
- 2022Revisiting Neural Scaling Laws in Language and Visioncited by 132
- 2018A Kernel Theory of Modern Data Augmentationcited by 106
- 2021Scalable Marginal Likelihood Estimation for Model Selection in Deep Learningcited by 106
- 2019Faster AutoAugment: Learning Augmentation Strategies using Backpropagationcited by 96
- 2020On the Benefits of Invariance in Neural Networkscited by 79
- 2022PAC-Bayes Compression Bounds So Tight That They Can Explain Generalizationcited by 76
- 2024Variational Bayesian Last Layerscited by 69
- 2022Do Bayesian Neural Networks Need To Be Fully Stochastic?cited by 63
- 2020All You Need is a Good Functional Prior for Bayesian Deep Learningcited by 61
- 2025Deep Learning is Not So Mysterious or Differentcited by 56
- 2018Learning Invariances using the Marginal Likelihoodcited by 51
- 2022On Uncertainty, Tempering, and Data Augmentation in Bayesian Classificationcited by 46
- 2021Martingale posterior distributionscited by 45
- 2022Invariance Learning in Deep Neural Networks with Differentiable Laplace Approximationscited by 42
- 2021Data augmentation in Bayesian neural networks and the cold posterior effectcited by 36
- 2021Direct Differentiable Augmentation Searchcited by 28
- 2022On the Strong Correlation Between Model Invariance and Generalizationcited by 23
- 2020Meta Approach to Data Augmentation Optimizationcited by 22
- 2022A Theory of PAC Learnability under Transformation Invariancescited by 21
- 2020Learning Data Augmentation with Online Bilevel Optimization for Image Classificationcited by 20
- 2022Deep AutoAugmentcited by 18
- 2022Automatic Data Augmentation via Invariance-Constrained Learningcited by 17
- 2021Learning Augmentation Distributions using Transformed Risk Minimizationcited by 13
- 2022How Tempering Fixes Data Augmentation in Bayesian Neural Networkscited by 13
- 2024Posterior Uncertainty Quantification in Neural Networks using Data Augmentationcited by 9
- 2023One-Line-of-Code Data Mollification Improves Optimization of Likelihood-based Generative Modelscited by 4
- 2019Data Augmentation for Bayesian Deep Learningcited by 2
- 2024Robust Classification by Coupling Data Mollification with Label Smoothingcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.
- 2025Universal Adaptive Environment Discoverycited by 0
- 2025Universal Adaptive Environment Discovery14 Oct 2025