EvidenceMoE: A Physics-Guided Mixture-of-Experts with Evidential Critics for Advancing Fluorescence Light Detection and Ranging in Scattering Media
On the map: Mixture-of-experts → Vision mixture-of-experts
Abstract (arXiv)
Fluorescence LiDAR (FLiDAR), a Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) technology employed for distance and depth estimation across medical, automotive, and other fields, encounters significant computational challenges in scattering media. The complex nature of the acquired FLiDAR signal, particularly in such environments, makes isolating photon time-of-flight (related to target depth) and intrinsic fluorescence lifetime exceptionally difficult, thus limiting the effectiveness of current analytical and computational methodologies. To overcome this limitation, we present a Physics-Guided Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) framework tailored for specialized modeling of diverse temporal components. In contrast to the conventional MoE approaches our expert models are informed by underlying physics, such as the radiative transport equation governing photon propagation in scattering media. Central to our approach is EvidenceMoE, which integrates Evidence-Based Dirichlet Critics (EDCs). These critic models assess the reliability of each expert's output by providing per-expert quality scores and corrective feedback. A Decider Network then leverages this information to fuse expert predictions into a robust final estimate adaptively. We validate our method using realistically simulated Fluorescence LiDAR (FLiDAR) data for non-invasive cancer cell depth detection generated from photon transport models in tissue. Our framework demonstrates strong performance, achieving a normalized root mean squared error (NRMSE) of 0.030 for depth estimation and 0.074 for fluorescence lifetime.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Vision mixture-of-experts, one of 12 directions in Mixture-of-experts. Builds on 14 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 May 2025.
Builds on
14 of 36 references.
Closest ancestors · 1
Same direction, newest first
Other references · 13
- 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,448
- 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,926
- 2017Outrageously Large Neural Networks: The Sparsely-Gated Mixture-of-Experts Layercited by 3,509
- 2017What Uncertainties Do We Need in Bayesian Deep Learning for Computer Vision?cited by 2,352
- 2019Can You Trust Your Model's Uncertainty? Evaluating Predictive Uncertainty Under Dataset Shiftcited by 1,287
- 2019Aleatoric and Epistemic Uncertainty in Machine Learning: An Introduction to Concepts and Methodscited by 913
- 2018Evidential Deep Learning to Quantify Classification Uncertaintycited by 732
- 2019Deep Evidential Regressioncited by 355
- 2020Hands-on Bayesian Neural Networks -- a Tutorial for Deep Learning Userscited by 338
- 2024Time-MoE: Billion-Scale Time Series Foundation Models with Mixture of Expertscited by 287
- 2020Inductive Biases for Deep Learning of Higher-Level Cognitioncited by 275
- 2022On the Representation Collapse of Sparse Mixture of Expertscited by 157
1 more
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Physics-Aware Diffusion for LiDAR Point Cloud Densification
- 2025Light Transport-aware Diffusion Posterior Sampling for Single-View Reconstruction of 3D Volumes
- 2026Measurement-Adapted Eigentask Representations for Photon-Limited Optical Readout
- 2025HazeMatching: Dehazing Light Microscopy Images with Guided Conditional Flow Matching
- 2026Iterate or Widen? When Test-Time Refinement Helps LiDAR Scene Completion: A Controlled Study of Evidence Geometry, Training Coverage, and Compute
- 2026Distill-Belief: Closed-Loop Inverse Source Localization and Characterization in Physical Fields
- 2025Online Feedback Efficient Active Target Discovery in Partially Observable Environments
- 2026Imaging-101: Benchmarking LLM Coding Agents on Scientific Computational Imaging