mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Addressing Data Quality Decompensation in Federated Learning via Dynamic Client Selection

arXiv 2505.21219 ↗First posted 27 May 2025cs.LG cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In cross-silo Federated Learning (FL), client selection is critical to ensure high model performance, yet it remains challenging due to data quality decompensation, budget constraints, and incentive compatibility. As training progresses, these factors exacerbate client heterogeneity and degrade global performance. Most existing approaches treat these challenges in isolation, making jointly optimizing multiple factors difficult. To address this, we propose Shapley-Bid Reputation Optimized Federated Learning (SBRO-FL), a unified framework integrating dynamic bidding, reputation modeling, and cost-aware selection. Clients submit bids based on their perceived data quality, and their contributions are evaluated using Shapley values to quantify their marginal impact on the global model. A reputation system, inspired by prospect theory, captures historical performance while penalizing inconsistency. The client selection problem is formulated as a 0-1 integer program that maximizes reputation-weighted utility under budget constraints. Experiments on FashionMNIST, EMNIST, CIFAR-10, and SVHN datasets show that SBRO-FL improves accuracy, convergence speed, and robustness, even in adversarial and low-bid interference scenarios. Our results highlight the importance of balancing data reliability, incentive compatibility, and cost efficiency to enable scalable and trustworthy FL deployments.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 May 2025.

Builds on

19 of 50 references.

References · 19

  1. 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,669
  2. 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,349
  3. 2019On the Convergence of FedAvg on Non-IID Datacited by 1,229
  4. 2019Towards Federated Learning at Scale: System Designcited by 832
  5. 2019Data Shapley: Equitable Valuation of Data for Machine Learningcited by 629
  6. 2016Federated Optimization: Distributed Machine Learning for On-Device Intelligencecited by 564
  7. 2019Local Model Poisoning Attacks to Byzantine-Robust Federated Learningcited by 493
  8. 2018Client Selection for Federated Learning with Heterogeneous Resources in Mobile Edgecited by 352
  9. 2021Clustered Sampling: Low-Variance and Improved Representativity for Clients Selection in Federated Learningcited by 93
  10. 2023Decentralized Federated Learning: A Survey and Perspectivecited by 86
  11. 2022Survey on Federated Learning Threats: concepts, taxonomy on attacks and defences, experimental study and challengescited by 84
  12. 2019Federated Learning for Edge Networks: Resource Optimization and Incentive Mechanismcited by 75
7 more
  1. 2021GTG-Shapley: Efficient and Accurate Participant Contribution Evaluation in Federated Learningcited by 74
  2. 2020Data Poisoning Attacks on Federated Machine Learningcited by 62
  3. 2019Motivating Workers in Federated Learning: A Stackelberg Game Perspectivecited by 45
  4. 2019Toward an Automated Auction Framework for Wireless Federated Learning Services Marketcited by 38
  5. 2021Evaluating Federated Learning for Intrusion Detection in Internet of Things: Review and Challengescited by 16
  6. 2022Incentive Mechanism Design for Joint Resource Allocation in Blockchain-based Federated Learningcited by 13
  7. 2024FLEX: FLEXible Federated Learning Frameworkcited by 4

Built on by

Not cited yet.