mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Automatic Transmission for LLM Tiers: Optimizing Cost and Accuracy in Large Language Models

arXiv 2505.20921 ↗First posted 27 May 2025cs.CL cs.AIcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

LLM providers typically offer multiple LLM tiers, varying in performance and price. As NLP tasks become more complex and modularized, selecting the suitable LLM tier for each subtask is a key challenge to balance between cost and performance. To address the problem, we introduce LLM Automatic Transmission (LLM-AT) framework that automatically selects LLM tiers without training. LLM-AT consists of Starter, Generator, and Judge. The starter selects the initial LLM tier expected to solve the given question, the generator produces a response using the LLM of the selected tier, and the judge evaluates the validity of the response. If the response is invalid, LLM-AT iteratively upgrades to a higher-tier model, generates a new response, and re-evaluates until a valid response is obtained. Additionally, we propose accuracy estimator, which enables the suitable initial LLM tier selection without training. Given an input question, accuracy estimator estimates the expected accuracy of each LLM tier by computing the valid response rate across top-k similar queries from past inference records. Experiments demonstrate that LLM-AT achieves superior performance while reducing costs, making it a practical solution for real-world applications.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 May 2025.

Builds on

17 of 27 references.

References · 17

  1. 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,695
  2. 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,371
  3. 2018Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challengecited by 4,886
  4. 2023Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedbackcited by 3,442
  5. 2023GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmarkcited by 2,879
  6. 2018Can a Suit of Armor Conduct Electricity? A New Dataset for Open Book Question Answeringcited by 2,164
  7. 2024MMLU-Pro: A More Robust and Challenging Multi-Task Language Understanding Benchmarkcited by 1,848
  8. 2022Program of Thoughts Prompting: Disentangling Computation from Reasoning for Numerical Reasoning Taskscited by 1,076
  9. 2023Large Language Models Cannot Self-Correct Reasoning Yetcited by 1,017
  10. 2023FrugalGPT: How to Use Large Language Models While Reducing Cost and Improving Performancecited by 853
  11. 2020Aligning AI With Shared Human Valuescited by 723
  12. 2024RouteLLM: Learning to Route LLMs with Preference Datacited by 682
5 more
  1. 2024Hybrid LLM: Cost-Efficient and Quality-Aware Query Routingcited by 372
  2. 2024Don't Hallucinate, Abstain: Identifying LLM Knowledge Gaps via Multi-LLM Collaborationcited by 180
  3. 2023LLM-Based Agent Society Investigation: Collaboration and Confrontation in Avalon Gameplaycited by 63
  4. 2024Triad: A Framework Leveraging a Multi-Role LLM-based Agent to Solve Knowledge Base Question Answeringcited by 18
  5. 2019Crowdsourced Truth Discovery in the Presence of Hierarchies for Knowledge Fusioncited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.