mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Monocle: Hybrid Local-Global In-Context Evaluation for Long-Text Generation with Uncertainty-Based Active Learning

arXiv 2505.20195 ↗First posted 26 May 2025cs.CLcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Assessing the quality of long-form, model-generated text is challenging, even with advanced LLM-as-a-Judge methods, due to performance degradation as input length increases. To address this issue, we propose a divide-and-conquer approach, which breaks down the comprehensive evaluation task into a series of localized scoring tasks, followed by a final global assessment. This strategy allows for more granular and manageable evaluations, ensuring that each segment of the text is assessed in isolation for both coherence and quality, while also accounting for the overall structure and consistency of the entire piece. Moreover, we introduce a hybrid in-context learning approach that leverages human annotations to enhance the performance of both local and global evaluations. By incorporating human-generated feedback directly into the evaluation process, this method allows the model to better align with human judgment. Finally, we develop an uncertainty-based active learning algorithm that efficiently selects data samples for human annotation, thereby reducing annotation costs in practical scenarios. Experimental results show that the proposed evaluation framework outperforms several representative baselines, highlighting the effectiveness of our approach.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 May 2025.

Builds on

21 of 31 references.

References · 21

  1. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
  2. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 13,958
  3. 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,462
  4. 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,416
  5. 2024A Survey on LLM-as-a-Judgecited by 1,384
  6. 2023LongBench: A Bilingual, Multitask Benchmark for Long Context Understandingcited by 1,378
  7. 2024RULER: What's the Real Context Size of Your Long-Context Language Models?cited by 1,270
  8. 2020BLEURT: Learning Robust Metrics for Text Generationcited by 1,196
  9. 2024∞Bench: Extending Long Context Evaluation Beyond 100K Tokenscited by 360
  10. 2023Effective Long-Context Scaling of Foundation Modelscited by 301
  11. 2024BABILong: Testing the Limits of LLMs with Long Context Reasoning-in-a-Haystackcited by 211
  12. 2024Data Engineering for Scaling Language Models to 128K Contextcited by 183
9 more
  1. 2024LongWriter: Unleashing 10,000+ Word Generation from Long Context LLMscited by 142
  2. 2024Leave No Document Behind: Benchmarking Long-Context LLMs with Extended Multi-Doc QAcited by 121
  3. 2024AutoSurvey: Large Language Models Can Automatically Write Surveyscited by 116
  4. 2018Quantifying Uncertainties in Natural Language Processing Taskscited by 79
  5. 2024LongGenBench: Benchmarking Long-Form Generation in Long Context LLMscited by 47
  6. 2019Improving Back-Translation with Uncertainty-based Confidence Estimationcited by 34
  7. 2024NovelQA: Benchmarking Question Answering on Documents Exceeding 200K Tokenscited by 31
  8. 2025LongProc: Benchmarking Long-Context Language Models on Long Procedural Generationcited by 28
  9. 2024LCFO: Long Context and Long Form Output Dataset and Benchmarkingcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.