mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

DFIR-Metric: A Benchmark Dataset for Evaluating Large Language Models in Digital Forensics and Incident Response

arXiv 2505.19973 ↗First posted 26 May 2025cs.CR cs.AIcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Digital Forensics and Incident Response (DFIR) involves analyzing digital evidence to support legal investigations. Large Language Models (LLMs) offer new opportunities in DFIR tasks such as log analysis and memory forensics, but their susceptibility to errors and hallucinations raises concerns in high-stakes contexts. Despite growing interest, there is no comprehensive benchmark to evaluate LLMs across both theoretical and practical DFIR domains. To address this gap, we present DFIR-Metric, a benchmark with three components: (1) Knowledge Assessment: a set of 700 expert-reviewed multiple-choice questions sourced from industry-standard certifications and official documentation; (2) Realistic Forensic Challenges: 150 CTF-style tasks testing multi-step reasoning and evidence correlation; and (3) Practical Analysis: 500 disk and memory forensics cases from the NIST Computer Forensics Tool Testing Program (CFTT). We evaluated 14 LLMs using DFIR-Metric, analyzing both their accuracy and consistency across trials. We also introduce a new metric, the Task Understanding Score (TUS), designed to more effectively evaluate models in scenarios where they achieve near-zero accuracy. This benchmark offers a rigorous, reproducible foundation for advancing AI in digital forensics. All scripts, artifacts, and results are available on the project website at https://github.com/DFIR-Metric.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 May 2025.

Builds on

19 of 35 references.

References · 19

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2018GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understandingcited by 4,899
  3. 2016SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Textcited by 4,148
  4. 2024FrontierMath: A Benchmark for Evaluating Advanced Mathematical Reasoning in AIcited by 243
  5. 2023LawBench: Benchmarking Legal Knowledge of Large Language Modelscited by 117
  6. 2023Benchmarking large language models for biomedical natural language processing applications and recommendationscited by 78
  7. 2024Benchmark Self-Evolving: A Multi-Agent Framework for Dynamic LLM Evaluationcited by 75
  8. 2024CTIBench: A Benchmark for Evaluating LLMs in Cyber Threat Intelligencecited by 62
  9. 2024CyberMetric: A Benchmark Dataset based on Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Evaluating LLMs in Cybersecurity Knowledgecited by 55
  10. 2023Revolutionizing Cyber Threat Detection with Large Language Models: A privacy-preserving BERT-based Lightweight Model for IoT/IIoT Devicescited by 39
  11. 2024Generative AI in Cybersecurity: A Comprehensive Review of LLM Applications and Vulnerabilitiescited by 21
  12. 2023ChatGPT for Digital Forensic Investigation: The Good, The Bad, and The Unknowncited by 17
7 more
  1. 2025Digital Forensics in the Age of Large Language Modelscited by 10
  2. 2023ChatGPT, Llama, can you write my report? An experiment on assisted digital forensics reports written using (Local) Large Language Modelscited by 8
  3. 2024GenDFIR: Advancing Cyber Incident Timeline Analysis Through Retrieval Augmented Generation and Large Language Modelscited by 7
  4. 2023AVScan2Vec: Feature Learning on Antivirus Scan Data for Production-Scale Malware Corporacited by 5
  5. 2024Dynamic Intelligence Assessment: Benchmarking LLMs on the Road to AGI with a Focus on Model Confidencecited by 5
  6. 2022Collaborative Feature Maps of Networks and Hosts for AI-driven Intrusion Detectioncited by 4
  7. 2025Towards a standardized methodology and dataset for evaluating LLM-based digital forensic timeline analysiscited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 3.

4 papers.