mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

How Does Sequence Modeling Architecture Influence Base Capabilities of Pre-trained Language Models? Exploring Key Architecture Design Principles to Avoid Base Capabilities Degradation

arXiv 2505.18522 ↗First posted 24 May 2025cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Pre-trained language models represented by the Transformer have been proven to possess strong base capabilities, and the representative self-attention mechanism in the Transformer has become a classic in sequence modeling architectures. Different from the work of proposing sequence modeling architecture to improve the efficiency of attention mechanism, this work focuses on the impact of sequence modeling architectures on base capabilities. Specifically, our concern is: How exactly do sequence modeling architectures affect the base capabilities of pre-trained language models? In this work, we first point out that the mixed domain pre-training setting commonly adopted in existing architecture design works fails to adequately reveal the differences in base capabilities among various architectures. To address this, we propose a limited domain pre-training setting with out-of-distribution testing, which successfully uncovers significant differences in base capabilities among architectures at an early stage. Next, we analyze the base capabilities of stateful sequence modeling architectures, and find that they exhibit significant degradation in base capabilities compared to the Transformer. Then, through a series of architecture component analysis, we summarize a key architecture design principle: A sequence modeling architecture need possess full-sequence arbitrary selection capability to avoid degradation in base capabilities. Finally, we empirically validate this principle using an extremely simple Top-1 element selection architecture and further generalize it to a more practical Top-1 chunk selection architecture. Experimental results demonstrate our proposed sequence modeling architecture design principle and suggest that our work can serve as a valuable reference for future architecture improvements and novel designs.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 41 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 May 2025.

Builds on

41 of 53 references.

References · 41

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  3. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  4. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
  5. 2018Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challengecited by 4,710
  6. 2023Mamba: Linear-Time Sequence Modeling with Selective State Spacescited by 4,616
  7. 2019HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?cited by 4,018
  8. 2020Longformer: The Long-Document Transformercited by 3,362
  9. 2019PIQA: Reasoning about Physical Commonsense in Natural Languagecited by 2,818
  10. 2023FlashAttention-2: Faster Attention with Better Parallelism and Work Partitioningcited by 2,551
  11. 2021Efficiently Modeling Long Sequences with Structured State Spacescited by 2,424
  12. 2019BoolQ: Exploring the Surprising Difficulty of Natural Yes/No Questionscited by 2,140
29 more
  1. 2018Can a Suit of Armor Conduct Electricity? A New Dataset for Open Book Question Answeringcited by 2,114
  2. 2020Transformers are RNNs: Fast Autoregressive Transformers with Linear Attentioncited by 1,979
  3. 2020GLU Variants Improve Transformercited by 1,724
  4. 2020Big Bird: Transformers for Longer Sequencescited by 1,673
  5. 2018Know What You Don't Know: Unanswerable Questions for SQuADcited by 1,538
  6. 2019Generating Long Sequences with Sparse Transformerscited by 1,523
  7. 2019Root Mean Square Layer Normalizationcited by 1,425
  8. 2024Transformers are SSMs: Generalized Models and Efficient Algorithms Through Structured State Space Dualitycited by 1,283
  9. 2024RULER: What's the Real Context Size of Your Long-Context Language Models?cited by 1,270
  10. 2021Train Short, Test Long: Attention with Linear Biases Enables Input Length Extrapolationcited by 1,085
  11. 2017RACE: Large-scale ReAding Comprehension Dataset From Examinationscited by 851
  12. 2023RWKV: Reinventing RNNs for the Transformer Eracited by 814
  13. 2017Crowdsourcing Multiple Choice Science Questionscited by 742
  14. 2023Retentive Network: A Successor to Transformer for Large Language Modelscited by 594
  15. 2024Gated Delta Networks: Improving Mamba2 with Delta Rulecited by 483
  16. 2021Linear Transformers Are Secretly Fast Weight Programmerscited by 471
  17. 2024Repeat After Me: Transformers are Better than State Space Models at Copyingcited by 208
  18. 2020Synthesizer: Rethinking Self-Attention in Transformer Modelscited by 204
  19. 2023LongNet: Scaling Transformers to 1,000,000,000 Tokenscited by 201
  20. 2024Simple linear attention language models balance the recall-throughput tradeoffcited by 197
  21. 2023Zoology: Measuring and Improving Recall in Efficient Language Modelscited by 188
  22. 2024Flex Attention: A Programming Model for Generating Optimized Attention Kernelscited by 180
  23. 2024Eagle and Finch: RWKV with Matrix-Valued States and Dynamic Recurrencecited by 155
  24. 2017Parallelizing Linear Recurrent Neural Nets Over Sequence Lengthcited by 126
  25. 2021FastMoE: A Fast Mixture-of-Expert Training Systemcited by 110
  26. 2023Language Models Enable Simple Systems for Generating Structured Views of Heterogeneous Data Lakescited by 101
  27. 2024RNNs are not Transformers (Yet): The Key Bottleneck on In-context Retrievalcited by 62
  28. 2024Autonomous Data Selection with Zero-shot Generative Classifiers for Mathematical Textscited by 26
  29. 2024Do Efficient Transformers Really Save Computation?cited by 20

Built on by

Not cited yet.