Architectural Backdoors for Within-Batch Data Stealing and Model Inference Manipulation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
For nearly a decade the academic community has investigated backdoors in neural networks, primarily focusing on classification tasks where adversaries manipulate the model prediction. While demonstrably malicious, the immediate real-world impact of such prediction-altering attacks has remained unclear. In this paper we introduce a novel and significantly more potent class of backdoors that builds upon recent advancements in architectural backdoors. We demonstrate how these backdoors can be specifically engineered to exploit batched inference, a common technique for hardware utilization, enabling large-scale user data manipulation and theft. By targeting the batching process, these architectural backdoors facilitate information leakage between concurrent user requests and allow attackers to fully control model responses directed at other users within the same batch. In other words, an attacker who can change the model architecture can set and steal model inputs and outputs of other users within the same batch. We show that such attacks are not only feasible but also alarmingly effective, can be readily injected into prevalent model architectures, (e.g. Transformers), and represent a truly malicious threat to user privacy and system integrity. Critically, to counteract this new class of vulnerabilities, we propose a deterministic mitigation strategy that provides formal guarantees against this new attack vector, unlike prior work that relied on LLMs to find the backdoors. Our mitigation strategy employs a novel Information Flow Control mechanism that analyzes the model graph and proves non-interference between different user inputs within the same batch. Using our mitigation strategy we perform a large scale analysis of models hosted through Hugging Face and find over 200 models that introduce (unintended) information leakage between batch entries due to the use of dynamic quantization.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 23 May 2025.
Builds on
0 of 0 references.
No references here yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 2.
3 papers.
- 2025Your Compiler is Backdooring Your Model: Understanding and Exploiting Compilation Inconsistency Vulnerabilities in Deep Learning Compilerscited by 7
- 2026Quantamination: Dynamic Quantization Leaks Your Data Across the Batchcited by 2
- 2026SoK: Colluding Adversaries in Machine Learning Pipelinescited by 0
- 2026SoK: Colluding Adversaries in Machine Learning Pipelines8 Jun 2026
- 2026Quantamination: Dynamic Quantization Leaks Your Data Across the Batch29 Apr 2026
- 2025Your Compiler is Backdooring Your Model: Understanding and Exploiting Compilation Inconsistency Vulnerabilities in Deep Learning Compilers14 Sep 2025
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2022Architectural Backdoors in Neural Networks
- 2025Architectural Backdoors in Deep Learning: A Survey of Vulnerabilities, Detection, and Defense
- 2025DeBackdoor: A Deductive Framework for Detecting Backdoor Attacks on Deep Models with Limited Data
- 2022ImpNet: Imperceptible and blackbox-undetectable backdoors in compiled neural networks
- 2023Evil from Within: Machine Learning Backdoors through Hardware Trojans
- 2026Hardware-Triggered Backdoors
- 2022Neural Architectural Backdoors
- 2022Hiding Behind Backdoors: Self-Obfuscation Against Generative Models