Emergent Hierarchical Structure in Large Language Models: An Information-Theoretic Framework for Multi-Scale Representation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Why do language models from different architecture families respond so differently to the same perturbation? We argue that the answer is not scale, but how architecture shapes information compression. Analyzing eight Transformer models (7B--70B parameters) from the Llama and Qwen families, we show that every model spontaneously develops discrete functional boundaries dividing its layers into Local, Intermediate, and Global processing segments -- yet boundary locations and per-segment brittleness are determined overwhelmingly by architecture family rather than model size or training configuration. We formalize this regularity as the Multi-Scale Probabilistic Generation Theory (MSPGT), which models an autoregressive Transformer as a Hierarchical Variational Information Bottleneck system and derives a tiered set of falsifiable predictions. Three predictions are strongly confirmed: all eight models exhibit two prominent phase-transition boundaries (P1.1); Llama boundary positions are stable across a 10× parameter range (CV=0.067--0.095) while Qwen positions vary widely (CV=0.465--0.726), precisely matching our strong- and weak-dominance conditions; and cross-architecture local-segment brittleness spans three orders of magnitude (493× ratio) -- a gap that architecture family alone predicts and that dwarfs any within-family or scale-driven variation.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 May 2025.
Builds on
17 of 28 references.
References · 17
- 2016Pointer Sentinel Mixture Modelscited by 3,096
- 2022Locating and Editing Factual Associations in GPTcited by 2,691
- 2018Deep contextualized word representationscited by 2,290
- 2019Similarity of Neural Network Representations Revisitedcited by 1,755
- 2023Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language Modelscited by 1,420
- 2019BERT Rediscovers the Classical NLP Pipelinecited by 1,059
- 2019What Does BERT Look At? An Analysis of BERT's Attentioncited by 1,003
- 2016Deep Variational Information Bottleneckcited by 930
- 2023Eliciting Latent Predictions from Transformers with the Tuned Lenscited by 623
- 2022Transformer Feed-Forward Layers Build Predictions by Promoting Concepts in the Vocabulary Spacecited by 532
- 2023Dissecting Recall of Factual Associations in Auto-Regressive Language Modelscited by 528
- 2017Opening the Black Box of Deep Neural Networks via Informationcited by 503
5 more
- 2024ShortGPT: Layers in Large Language Models are More Redundant Than You Expectcited by 383
- 2020Do Wide and Deep Networks Learn the Same Things? Uncovering How Neural Network Representations Vary with Width and Depthcited by 245
- 2024The Unreasonable Ineffectiveness of the Deeper Layerscited by 226
- 2023Causal Abstraction: A Theoretical Foundation for Mechanistic Interpretabilitycited by 205
- 2022Analyzing Transformers in Embedding Spacecited by 132
Built on by
Not cited yet.