mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Learning Representational Disparities

arXiv 2505.17533 ↗First posted 23 May 2025cs.LG cs.AI cs.CYcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We propose a fair machine learning algorithm to model interpretable differences between observed and desired human decision-making, with the latter aimed at reducing disparity in a downstream outcome impacted by the human decision. Prior work learns fair representations without considering the outcome in the decision-making process. We model the outcome disparities as arising due to the different representations of the input seen by the observed and desired decision-maker, which we term representational disparities. Our goal is to learn interpretable representational disparities which could potentially be corrected by specific nudges to the human decision, mitigating disparities in the downstream outcome; we frame this as a multi-objective optimization problem using a neural network. Under reasonable simplifying assumptions, we prove that our neural network model of the representational disparity learns interpretable weights that fully mitigate the outcome disparity. We validate objectives and interpret results using real-world German Credit, Adult, and Heritage Health datasets.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 May 2025.

Builds on

10 of 27 references.

References · 10

  1. 2021Convex optimizationcited by 2,515
  2. 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,917
  3. 2018Learning Adversarially Fair and Transferable Representationscited by 353
  4. 2020Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 194
  5. 2019A Framework for Understanding Sources of Harm throughout the Machine Learning Life Cyclecited by 193
  6. 2019Inherent Tradeoffs in Learning Fair Representationscited by 144
  7. 2019Conditional Learning of Fair Representationscited by 78
  8. 2023Toward Operationalizing Pipeline-aware ML Fairness: A Research Agenda for Developing Practical Guidelines and Toolscited by 7
  9. 2023Provable Detection of Propagating Sampling Bias in Prediction Modelscited by 1
  10. 2023Learning Fair Representations with High-Confidence Guaranteescited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.