mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

CReSt: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Retrieval-Augmented Generation with Complex Reasoning over Structured Documents

arXiv 2505.17503 ↗First posted 23 May 2025cs.CLcited by 1

On the map: LLM reasoning → Knowledge- and tool-augmented reasoning

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

Large Language Models (LLMs) have made substantial progress in recent years, yet evaluating their capabilities in practical Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) scenarios remains challenging. In practical applications, LLMs must demonstrate complex reasoning, refuse to answer appropriately, provide precise citations, and effectively understand document layout. These capabilities are crucial for advanced task handling, uncertainty awareness, maintaining reliability, and structural understanding. While some of the prior works address these aspects individually, there is a need for a unified framework that evaluates them collectively in practical RAG scenarios. To address this, we present CReSt (A Comprehensive Benchmark for Retrieval-Augmented Generation with Complex Reasoning over Structured Documents), a benchmark designed to assess these key dimensions holistically. CReSt comprises 2,245 human-annotated examples in English and Korean, designed to capture practical RAG scenarios that require complex reasoning over structured documents. It also introduces a tailored evaluation methodology to comprehensively assess model performance in these critical areas. Our evaluation shows that even advanced LLMs struggle to perform consistently across these dimensions, underscoring key areas for improvement. We release CReSt to support further research and the development of more robust RAG systems. The dataset and code are available at: https://github.com/UpstageAI/CReSt.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Knowledge- and tool-augmented reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 17 of its 18 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 May 2025.

Builds on

17 of 18 references.

Closest ancestors · 2

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024Fact, Fetch, and Reason: A Unified Evaluation of Retrieval-Augmented Generation19 Sep
  2. 2023Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Large Language Models: A Survey18 Dec

Other references · 15

  1. 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,459
  2. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,626
  3. 2018HotpotQA: A Dataset for Diverse, Explainable Multi-hop Question Answeringcited by 3,754
  4. 2022Least-to-Most Prompting Enables Complex Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 1,407
  5. 2018FEVER: a large-scale dataset for Fact Extraction and VERificationcited by 1,375
  6. 2023Enabling Large Language Models to Generate Text with Citationscited by 595
  7. 2020KILT: a Benchmark for Knowledge Intensive Language Taskscited by 573
  8. 2023Plan-and-Solve Prompting: Improving Zero-Shot Chain-of-Thought Reasoning by Large Language Modelscited by 560
  9. 2024A Survey on RAG Meeting LLMs: Towards Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Modelscited by 452
  10. 2023Benchmarking Large Language Models in Retrieval-Augmented Generationcited by 312
  11. 2025Chain of Draft: Thinking Faster by Writing Lesscited by 297
  12. 2025VDocRAG: Retrieval-Augmented Generation over Visually-Rich Documentscited by 59
3 more
  1. 2024CRUD-RAG: A Comprehensive Chinese Benchmark for Retrieval-Augmented Generation of Large Language Modelscited by 50
  2. 2024UDA: A Benchmark Suite for Retrieval Augmented Generation in Real-world Document Analysiscited by 40
  3. 2024HtmlRAG: HTML is Better Than Plain Text for Modeling Retrieved Knowledge in RAG Systemscited by 37

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Stronger Baselines for Retrieval-Augmented Generation with Long-Context Language Models
  2. 2025PRGB Benchmark: A Robust Placeholder-Assisted Algorithm for Benchmarking Retrieval-Augmented Generation
  3. 2025When Retrieval Succeeds and Fails: Rethinking Retrieval-Augmented Generation for LLMs
  4. 2025Retrieval Augmented Generation Evaluation in the Era of Large Language Models: A Comprehensive Survey
  5. 2026Mapping the RAG Landscape: A Four Axis Taxonomy of Efficiency, Defense, Interactivity, and Reasoning
  6. 2025Are We on the Right Way for Assessing Document Retrieval-Augmented Generation?
  7. 2024A Comprehensive Survey of Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG): Evolution, Current Landscape and Future Directions
  8. 2025Towards Global Retrieval Augmented Generation: A Benchmark for Corpus-Level Reasoning