Diagnosing Vision Language Models' Perception by Leveraging Human Methods for Color Vision Deficiencies
On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → VLM benchmarks and visual reasoning
Abstract (arXiv)
Large-scale Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) are being deployed in real-world settings that require visual inference. As capabilities improve, applications in navigation, education, and accessibility are becoming practical. These settings require accommodation of perceptual variation rather than assuming a uniform visual experience. Color perception illustrates this requirement: it is central to visual understanding yet varies across individuals due to Color Vision Deficiencies, an aspect largely ignored in multimodal AI. In this work, we examine whether LVLMs can account for variation in color perception using the Ishihara Test. We evaluate model behavior through generation, confidence, and internal representation, using Ishihara plates as controlled stimuli that expose perceptual differences. Although models possess factual knowledge about color vision deficiencies and can describe the test, they fail to reproduce the perceptual outcomes experienced by affected individuals and instead default to normative color perception. These results indicate that current systems lack mechanisms for representing alternative perceptual experiences, raising concerns for accessibility and inclusive deployment in multimodal settings.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in VLM benchmarks and visual reasoning, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 14 of its 49 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 May 2025.
Builds on
14 of 49 references.
Closest ancestors · 1
Same direction, newest first
Other references · 13
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
- 2024Qwen2-VL: Enhancing Vision-Language Model's Perception of the World at Any Resolutioncited by 4,151
- 2023RT-2: Vision-Language-Action Models Transfer Web Knowledge to Robotic Controlcited by 2,993
- 2016Making the V in VQA Matter: Elevating the Role of Image Understanding in Visual Question Answeringcited by 2,498
- 2021ViLT: Vision-and-Language Transformer Without Convolution or Region Supervisioncited by 1,224
- 2017Don't Just Assume; Look and Answer: Overcoming Priors for Visual Question Answeringcited by 337
- 2024Do Llamas Work in English? On the Latent Language of Multilingual Transformerscited by 275
- 2025Do Multilingual LLMs Think In English?cited by 75
- 2020Roses Are Red, Violets Are Blue... but Should Vqa Expect Them To?cited by 69
- 2021The World of an Octopus: How Reporting Bias Influences a Language Model's Perception of Colorcited by 32
- 2025ColorBench: Can VLMs See and Understand the Colorful World? A Comprehensive Benchmark for Color Perception, Reasoning, and Robustnesscited by 28
- 2024ColorSwap: A Color and Word Order Dataset for Multimodal Evaluationcited by 11
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2.
2 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024Evaluating Model Perception of Color Illusions in Photorealistic Scenes
- 2026Human-AI Perceptual Alignment by Playing Hues and Cues
- 2026From Structure to Synergy: A Survey of Vision-Language Perception Paradigm Evolution in Multimodal Large Language Models
- 2026Spatial Colour Mixing Illusions as a Perception Stress Test for Vision-Language Models
- 2025HueManity: Probing Fine-Grained Visual Perception in MLLMs
- 2025Not There Yet: Evaluating Vision Language Models in Simulating the Visual Perception of People with Low Vision
- 2025ColorBlindnessEval: Can Vision-Language Models Pass Color Blindness Tests?
- 2025Human Cognitive Benchmarks Reveal Foundational Visual Gaps in MLLMs