Discovering Forbidden Topics in Language Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Refusal discovery is the task of identifying the full set of topics that a language model refuses to discuss. We introduce this new problem setting and develop a refusal discovery method, Iterated Prefill Crawler (IPC), that uses token prefilling to find forbidden topics. We benchmark IPC on Tulu-3-8B, an open-source model with public safety tuning data. Our crawler manages to retrieve 31 out of 36 topics within a budget of 1000 prompts. Next, we scale the crawler to a frontier model using the prefilling option of Claude-Haiku. Finally, we crawl three widely used open-weight models: Llama-3.3-70B and two of its variants finetuned for reasoning: DeepSeek-R1-70B and Perplexity-R1-1776-70B. DeepSeek-R1-70B reveals patterns consistent with censorship tuning: The model exhibits "thought suppression" behavior that indicates memorization of CCP-aligned responses. Although Perplexity-R1-1776-70B is robust to censorship, IPC elicits CCP-aligned refusals answers in the quantized model. Our findings highlight the critical need for refusal discovery methods to detect biases, boundaries, and alignment failures of AI systems.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 37 of its 65 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 May 2025.
Builds on
37 of 65 references.
References · 37
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
- 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 8,065
- 2021Finetuned Language Models Are Zero-Shot Learnerscited by 3,780
- 2023Universal and Transferable Adversarial Attacks on Aligned Language Modelscited by 3,104
- 2020Extracting Training Data from Large Language Modelscited by 2,189
- 2022Survey of Hallucination in Natural Language Generationcited by 2,075
- 2023Jailbroken: How Does LLM Safety Training Fail?cited by 1,651
- 2024HarmBench: A Standardized Evaluation Framework for Automated Red Teaming and Robust Refusalcited by 1,429
- 2024Sleeper Agents: Training Deceptive LLMs that Persist Through Safety Trainingcited by 529
- 2023Jailbreaking ChatGPT via Prompt Engineering: An Empirical Studycited by 498
- 2024WildGuard: Open One-Stop Moderation Tools for Safety Risks, Jailbreaks, and Refusals of LLMscited by 496
25 more
- 2024Jailbreaking Leading Safety-Aligned LLMs with Simple Adaptive Attackscited by 486
- 2024Safety Alignment Should Be Made More Than Just a Few Tokens Deepcited by 472
- 2021Multimodal datasets: misogyny, pornography, and malignant stereotypescited by 327
- 2019Tackling Climate Change with Machine Learningcited by 265
- 2022Red-Teaming the Stable Diffusion Safety Filtercited by 264
- 2020Bias and Debias in Recommender System: A Survey and Future Directionscited by 240
- 2024WildTeaming at Scale: From In-the-Wild Jailbreaks to (Adversarially) Safer Language Modelscited by 223
- 2023AI Deception: A Survey of Examples, Risks, and Potential Solutionscited by 188
- 2023Do the Rewards Justify the Means? Measuring Trade-Offs Between Rewards and Ethical Behavior in the MACHIAVELLI Benchmarkcited by 182
- 2023Large Language Models can Strategically Deceive their Users when Put Under Pressurecited by 146
- 2022OpenXAI: Towards a Transparent Evaluation of Model Explanationscited by 126
- 2024Black-Box Access is Insufficient for Rigorous AI Auditscited by 126
- 2023Foundation Models and Fair Usecited by 116
- 2023Copyright Violations and Large Language Modelscited by 108
- 2024The Art of Saying No: Contextual Noncompliance in Language Modelscited by 105
- 2023Evaluating Language-Model Agents on Realistic Autonomous Taskscited by 96
- 2020Saving Face: Investigating the Ethical Concerns of Facial Recognition Auditingcited by 89
- 2024Large Language Models Reflect the Ideology of their Creatorscited by 57
- 2023Bypassing the Safety Training of Open-Source LLMs with Priming Attackscited by 50
- 2023From Text to MITRE Techniques: Exploring the Malicious Use of Large Language Models for Generating Cyber Attack Payloadscited by 32
- 2023AI capabilities can be significantly improved without expensive retrainingcited by 28
- 2025Eliciting Language Model Behaviors with Investigator Agentscited by 23
- 2024Endless Jailbreaks with Bijection Learningcited by 19
- 2020Linguistic Fingerprints of Internet Censorship: the Case of SinaWeibocited by 2
- 2019Assessing Post Deletion in Sina Weibo: Multi-modal Classification of Hot Topicscited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 4; 2026: 5.
9 papers.
- 2025Narrow Finetuning Leaves Clearly Readable Traces in Activation Differencescited by 28
- 2025Spilling the Beans: Teaching LLMs to Self-Report Their Hidden Objectivescited by 15
- 2025Large Reasoning Models Learn Better Alignment from Flawed Thinkingcited by 13
- 2026Prefill Awareness in Large Language Modelscited by 4
- 2026How Alignment Routes: Localizing, Scaling, and Controlling Policy Circuits in Language Modelscited by 3
- 2025Matching Ranks Over Probability Yields Truly Deep Safety Alignmentcited by 0
- 2026AuAu: A Benchmark for Auditing Authoritarian Alignment in Large Language Modelscited by 0
- 2026Detecting Hidden Behaviors in LLMs via Activation-matched Finetuningcited by 0
- 2026Alignment of LRMs via Counter-Aligned Few-Shot Conversation Exposurecited by 0
- 2026Alignment of LRMs via Counter-Aligned Few-Shot Conversation Exposure16 Aug 2026
- 2026AuAu: A Benchmark for Auditing Authoritarian Alignment in Large Language Models15 Jun 2026
- 2026Prefill Awareness in Large Language Models10 Jun 2026
- 2026Detecting Hidden Behaviors in LLMs via Activation-matched Finetuning29 May 2026
- 2026How Alignment Routes: Localizing, Scaling, and Controlling Policy Circuits in Language Models6 Apr 2026
- 2025Matching Ranks Over Probability Yields Truly Deep Safety Alignment5 Dec 2025
- 2025Spilling the Beans: Teaching LLMs to Self-Report Their Hidden Objectives10 Nov 2025
- 2025Narrow Finetuning Leaves Clearly Readable Traces in Activation Differences14 Oct 2025
- 2025Large Reasoning Models Learn Better Alignment from Flawed Thinking1 Oct 2025
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024Refusal Tokens: A Simple Way to Calibrate Refusals in Large Language Models
- 2025RefusalBench: Generative Evaluation of Selective Refusal in Grounded Language Models
- 2025Refusal Steering: Fine-grained Control over LLM Refusal Behaviour for Sensitive Topics
- 2025Steering the CensorShip: Uncovering Representation Vectors for LLM "Thought" Control
- 2025Derailing Non-Answers via Logit Suppression at Output Subspace Boundaries in RLHF-Aligned Language Models
- 2025Beyond I'm Sorry, I Can't: Dissecting Large Language Model Refusal
- 2026HopRefusalBench: Diagnosing Refusal Failures in Search-Augmented Agents for Multi-Hop Reasoning
- 2026Understanding Content Moderation in Large Language Models through Restricted Books: From Refusal to Warning ↗