mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Development and Validation of Engagement and Rapport Scales for Evaluating User Experience in Multimodal Dialogue Systems

arXiv 2505.17075 ↗First posted 20 May 2025cs.CL cs.AIcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This study aimed to develop and validate two scales of engagement and rapport to evaluate the user experience quality with multimodal dialogue systems in the context of foreign language learning. The scales were designed based on theories of engagement in educational psychology, social psychology, and second language acquisition.Seventy-four Japanese learners of English completed roleplay and discussion tasks with trained human tutors and a dialog agent. After each dialogic task was completed, they responded to the scales of engagement and rapport. The validity and reliability of the scales were investigated through two analyses. We first conducted analysis of Cronbach's alpha coefficient and a series of confirmatory factor analyses to test the structural validity of the scales and the reliability of our designed items. We then compared the scores of engagement and rapport between the dialogue with human tutors and the one with a dialogue agent. The results revealed that our scales succeeded in capturing the difference in the dialogue experience quality between the human interlocutors and the dialogue agent from multiple perspectives.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 2 of its 18 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 May 2025.

Builds on

2 of 18 references.

References · 2

  1. 2019Survey on Evaluation Methods for Dialogue Systemscited by 126
  2. 2019Predictive Engagement: An Efficient Metric For Automatic Evaluation of Open-Domain Dialogue Systemscited by 36

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.