Mitigating Overfitting in Medical Imaging: Self-Supervised Pretraining vs. ImageNet Transfer Learning for Dermatological Diagnosis
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Deep learning has transformed computer vision but relies heavily on large labeled datasets and computational resources. Transfer learning, particularly fine-tuning pretrained models, offers a practical alternative; however, models pretrained on natural image datasets such as ImageNet may fail to capture domain-specific characteristics in medical imaging. This study introduces an unsupervised learning framework that extracts high-value dermatological features instead of relying solely on ImageNet-based pretraining. We employ a Variational Autoencoder (VAE) trained from scratch on a proprietary dermatological dataset, allowing the model to learn a structured and clinically relevant latent space. This self-supervised feature extractor is then compared to an ImageNet-pretrained backbone under identical classification conditions, highlighting the trade-offs between general-purpose and domain-specific pretraining. Our results reveal distinct learning patterns. The self-supervised model achieves a final validation loss of 0.110 (-33.33%), while the ImageNet-pretrained model stagnates at 0.100 (-16.67%), indicating overfitting. Accuracy trends confirm this: the self-supervised model improves from 45% to 65% (+44.44%) with a near-zero overfitting gap, whereas the ImageNet-pretrained model reaches 87% (+50.00%) but plateaus at 75% (+19.05%), with its overfitting gap increasing to +0.060. These findings suggest that while ImageNet pretraining accelerates convergence, it also amplifies overfitting on non-clinically relevant features. In contrast, self-supervised learning achieves steady improvements, stronger generalization, and superior adaptability, underscoring the importance of domain-specific feature extraction in medical imaging.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 10 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 May 2025.
Builds on
5 of 10 references.
References · 5
- 2022A ConvNet for the 2020scited by 3,579
- 2018Do Better ImageNet Models Transfer Better?cited by 565
- 2024The Road Less Scheduledcited by 163
- 2024Source Matters: Source Dataset Impact on Model Robustness in Medical Imagingcited by 10
- 2024Concordance in basal cell carcinoma diagnosis. Building a proper ground truth to train Artificial Intelligence toolscited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.