FreshRetailNet-50K: A Stockout-Annotated Censored Demand Dataset for Latent Demand Recovery and Forecasting in Fresh Retail
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Accurate demand estimation is critical for the retail business in guiding the inventory and pricing policies of perishable products. However, it faces fundamental challenges from censored sales data during stockouts, where unobserved demand creates systemic policy biases. Existing datasets lack the temporal resolution and annotations needed to address this censoring effect. To fill this gap, we present FreshRetailNet-50K, the first large-scale benchmark for censored demand estimation. It comprises 50,000 store-product time series of detailed hourly sales data from 898 stores in 18 major cities, encompassing 863 perishable SKUs meticulously annotated for stockout events. The hourly stock status records unique to this dataset, combined with rich contextual covariates, including promotional discounts, precipitation, and temporal features, enable innovative research beyond existing solutions. We demonstrate one such use case of two-stage demand modeling: first, we reconstruct the latent demand during stockouts using precise hourly annotations. We then leverage the recovered demand to train robust demand forecasting models in the second stage. Experimental results show that this approach achieves a 2.73% improvement in prediction accuracy while reducing the systematic demand underestimation from 7.37% to near-zero bias. With unprecedented temporal granularity and comprehensive real-world information, FreshRetailNet-50K opens new research directions in demand imputation, perishable inventory optimization, and causal retail analytics. The unique annotation quality and scale of the dataset address long-standing limitations in retail AI, providing immediate solutions and a platform for future methodological innovation. The data (https://huggingface.co/datasets/Dingdong-Inc/FreshRetailNet-50K) and code (https://github.com/Dingdong-Inc/frn-50k-baseline}) are openly released.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 May 2025.
Builds on
17 of 41 references.
References · 17
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2020Informer: Beyond Efficient Transformer for Long Sequence Time-Series Forecastingcited by 2,141
- 2021Autoformer: Decomposition Transformers with Auto-Correlation for Long-Term Series Forecastingcited by 1,654
- 2022Are Transformers Effective for Time Series Forecasting?cited by 1,400
- 2022FEDformer: Frequency Enhanced Decomposed Transformer for Long-term Series Forecastingcited by 1,200
- 2023iTransformer: Inverted Transformers Are Effective for Time Series Forecastingcited by 906
- 2019Temporal Fusion Transformers for Interpretable Multi-horizon Time Series Forecastingcited by 748
- 2019Enhancing the Locality and Breaking the Memory Bottleneck of Transformer on Time Series Forecastingcited by 606
- 2021CSDI: Conditional Score-based Diffusion Models for Probabilistic Time Series Imputationcited by 577
- 2016Recurrent Neural Networks for Multivariate Time Series with Missing Valuescited by 548
- 2019GP-VAE: Deep Probabilistic Time Series Imputationcited by 171
- 2022SAITS: Self-Attention-based Imputation for Time Seriescited by 167
5 more
- 2023PriSTI: A Conditional Diffusion Framework for Spatiotemporal Imputationcited by 62
- 2023ImputeFormer: Low Rankness-Induced Transformers for Generalizable Spatiotemporal Imputationcited by 50
- 2023sasdim: self-adaptive noise scaling diffusion model for spatial time series imputationcited by 7
- 2024Score-CDM: Score-Weighted Convolutional Diffusion Model for Multivariate Time Series Imputationcited by 6
- 2025Offline Dynamic Inventory and Pricing Strategy: Addressing Censored and Dependent Demandcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 4.
4 papers.
- 2026TemporalBench: A Benchmark for Evaluating LLM-Based Agents on Contextual and Event-Informed Time Series Taskscited by 15
- 2026RetailBench: Benchmarking long horizon reasoning and coherent decision making of LLM agents in realistic retail environmentscited by 6
- 2026RetailBench: Evaluating Long-Horizon Autonomous Decision-Making and Strategy Stability of LLM Agents in Realistic Retail Environmentscited by 1
- 2026SCOPE: Supply-Chain Operations through Coupled Policies for End-to-End Coordinationcited by 0
- 2026SCOPE: Supply-Chain Operations through Coupled Policies for End-to-End Coordination30 Jul 2026
- 2026RetailBench: Benchmarking long horizon reasoning and coherent decision making of LLM agents in realistic retail environments14 Jun 2026
- 2026RetailBench: Evaluating Long-Horizon Autonomous Decision-Making and Strategy Stability of LLM Agents in Realistic Retail Environments17 Mar 2026
- 2026TemporalBench: A Benchmark for Evaluating LLM-Based Agents on Contextual and Event-Informed Time Series Tasks5 Feb 2026