mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Exploring Moral Exercises for Human Oversight of AI systems: Insights from Three Pilot Studies

arXiv 2505.15851 ↗First posted 20 May 2025cs.CY cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This paper elaborates on the concept of moral exercises as a means to help AI actors cultivate virtues that enable effective human oversight of AI systems. We explore the conceptual framework and significance of moral exercises, situating them within the contexts of philosophical discourse, ancient practices, and contemporary AI ethics scholarship. We outline the core pillars of the moral exercises methodology - eliciting an engaged personal disposition, fostering relational understanding, and cultivating technomoral wisdom - and emphasize their relevance to key activities and competencies essential for human oversight of AI systems. Our argument is supported by findings from three pilot studies involving a company, a multidisciplinary team of AI researchers, and higher education students. These studies allow us to explore both the potential and the limitations of moral exercises. Based on the collected data, we offer insights into how moral exercises can foster a responsible AI culture within organizations, and suggest directions for future research.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 May 2025.

Builds on

5 of 43 references.

References · 5

  1. 2018Manipulating and Measuring Model Interpretabilitycited by 256
  2. 2019Principles alone cannot guarantee ethical AIcited by 135
  3. 2021The Flaws of Policies Requiring Human Oversight of Government Algorithmscited by 44
  4. 2024On the Quest for Effectiveness in Human Oversight: Interdisciplinary Perspectivescited by 28
  5. 2023Moral Machine or Tyranny of the Majority?cited by 22

Built on by

Not cited yet.