mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Automated Fetal Biometry Assessment with Deep Ensembles using Sparse-Sampling of 2D Intrapartum Ultrasound Images

arXiv 2505.14572 ↗First posted 20 May 2025eess.IV cs.CV cs.LGcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The International Society of Ultrasound advocates Intrapartum Ultrasound (US) Imaging in Obstetrics and Gynecology (ISUOG) to monitor labour progression through changes in fetal head position. Two reliable ultrasound-derived parameters that are used to predict outcomes of instrumental vaginal delivery are the angle of progression (AoP) and head-symphysis distance (HSD). In this work, as part of the Intrapartum Ultrasounds Grand Challenge (IUGC) 2024, we propose an automated fetal biometry measurement pipeline to reduce intra- and inter-observer variability and improve measurement reliability. Our pipeline consists of three key tasks: (i) classification of standard planes (SP) from US videos, (ii) segmentation of fetal head and pubic symphysis from the detected SPs, and (iii) computation of the AoP and HSD from the segmented regions. We perform sparse sampling to mitigate class imbalances and reduce spurious correlations in task (i), and utilize ensemble-based deep learning methods for task (i) and (ii) to enhance generalizability under different US acquisition settings. Finally, to promote robustness in task iii) with respect to the structural fidelity of measurements, we retain the largest connected components and apply ellipse fitting to the segmentations. Our solution achieved ACC: 0.9452, F1: 0.9225, AUC: 0.983, MCC: 0.8361, DSC: 0.918, HD: 19.73, ASD: 5.71, DeltaAoP: 8.90 and DeltaHSD: 14.35 across an unseen hold-out set of 4 patients and 224 US frames. The results from the proposed automated pipeline can improve the understanding of labour arrest causes and guide the development of clinical risk stratification tools for efficient and effective prenatal care.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 May 2025.

Builds on

16 of 27 references.

References · 16

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,713
  3. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,364
  4. 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,720
  5. 2019EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6,442
  6. 2014Fully Convolutional Networks for Semantic Segmentationcited by 4,859
  7. 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,926
  8. 2018Encoder-Decoder with Atrous Separable Convolution for Semantic Image Segmentationcited by 3,223
  9. 2016Wide Residual Networkscited by 3,070
  10. 2017What Uncertainties Do We Need in Bayesian Deep Learning for Computer Vision?cited by 2,352
  11. 2021EfficientNetV2: Smaller Models and Faster Trainingcited by 1,135
  12. 2019UNet++: Redesigning Skip Connections to Exploit Multiscale Features in Image Segmentationcited by 586
4 more
  1. 2019Deep Ensembles: A Loss Landscape Perspectivecited by 443
  2. 2017Dual Path Networkscited by 119
  3. 2022A Deeper Look into Aleatoric and Epistemic Uncertainty Disentanglementcited by 87
  4. 2018From Same Photo: Cheating on Visual Kinship Challengescited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.

3 papers.