mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Hybrid Adaptive Modeling in Process Monitoring: Leveraging Sequence Encoders and Physics-Informed Neural Networks

arXiv 2505.14252 ↗First posted 20 May 2025cs.LG cs.AIcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In this work, we explore the integration of Sequence Encoding for Online Parameter Identification with Physics-Informed Neural Networks to create a model that, once trained, can be utilized for real time applications with variable parameters, boundary conditions, and initial conditions. Recently, the combination of PINNs with Sparse Regression has emerged as a method for performing dynamical system identification through supervised learning and sparse regression optimization, while also solving the dynamics using PINNs. However, this approach can be limited by variations in parameters or boundary and initial conditions, requiring retraining of the model whenever changes occur. In this work, we introduce an architecture that employs Deep Sets or Sequence Encoders to encode dynamic parameters, boundary conditions, and initial conditions, using these encoded features as inputs for the PINN, enabling the model to adapt to changes in parameters, BCs, and ICs. We apply this approach to three different problems. First, we analyze the Rossler ODE system, demonstrating the robustness of the model with respect to noise and its ability to generalize. Next, we explore the model's capability in a 2D Navier-Stokes PDE problem involving flow past a cylinder with a parametric sinusoidal inlet velocity function, showing that the model can encode pressure data from a few points to identify the inlet velocity profile and utilize physics to compute velocity and pressure throughout the domain. Finally, we address a 1D heat monitoring problem using real data from the heating of glass fiber and thermoplastic composite plates.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 May 2025.

Builds on

14 of 36 references.

References · 14

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2018Neural Tangent Kernel: Convergence and Generalization in Neural Networkscited by 2,621
  3. 2020Fourier Features Let Networks Learn High Frequency Functions in Low Dimensional Domainscited by 2,200
  4. 2017Deep Setscited by 1,421
  5. 2019DeepXDE: A deep learning library for solving differential equationscited by 619
  6. 2018PDE-Net 2.0: Learning PDEs from Data with A Numeric-Symbolic Hybrid Deep Networkcited by 210
  7. 2020Physics-informed learning of governing equations from scarce datacited by 167
  8. 2017Sparse identification of nonlinear dynamics for model predictive control in the low-data limitcited by 140
  9. 2022Forecast Evaluation for Data Scientists: Common Pitfalls and Best Practicescited by 55
  10. 2021Any equation is a forest: Symbolic genetic algorithm for discovering open-form partial differential equations (SGA-PDE)cited by 41
  11. 2020Fusing Physics-based and Deep Learning Models for Prognosticscited by 40
  12. 2018A Unified Framework for Sparse Relaxed Regularized Regression: SR3cited by 36
2 more
  1. 2021Multifidelity Modeling for Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs)cited by 25
  2. 2025Adaptive parameters identification for nonlinear dynamics using deep permutation invariant networkscited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.