Mitigating Pretraining-Induced Attention Asymmetry in 2D+ Electron Microscopy Image Segmentation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Vision models pretrained on large-scale RGB natural image datasets are widely reused for electron microscopy image segmentation. In electron microscopy, volumetric data are acquired as serial sections and processed as stacks of adjacent grayscale slices, where neighboring slices provide symmetric contextual information for identifying features on the central slice. The common strategy maps such stacks to pseudo-RGB inputs to enable transfer learning from pretrained models. However, this mapping imposes channel-specific semantics inherited from natural images, even though electron microscopy slices are homogeneous in the modality and symmetric in their predictive roles. As a result, pretrained models may encode inductive biases that are misaligned with the inherent symmetry of volumetric electron microscopy data. In this work, it is demonstrated that RGB-pretrained models systematically assign unequal importance to individual input slices when applied to stacked electron microscopy data, despite the absence of any intrinsic channel ordering. Using saliency-based attribution analysis across multiple architectures, a consistent channel-level asymmetry was observed that persists after fine-tuning and affects model interpretability, even when segmentation performance is unchanged. To address this issue, a targeted modification of pretraining weights based on uniform channel initialization was proposed, which restores symmetric feature attribution while preserving the benefits of pretraining. Experiments on the SNEMI, Lucchi and GF-PA66 datasets confirm a substantial reduction in attribution bias without compromising or even improving segmentation accuracy.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 May 2025.
Builds on
21 of 46 references.
References · 21
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,713
- 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,733
- 2018Encoder-Decoder with Atrous Separable Convolution for Semantic Image Segmentationcited by 3,223
- 2021SegFormer: Simple and Efficient Design for Semantic Segmentation with Transformerscited by 2,940
- 2013Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networkscited by 2,290
- 2014How transferable are features in deep neural networks?cited by 1,225
- 2019A Comprehensive Survey on Transfer Learningcited by 1,160
- 2017Grad-CAM++: Improved Visual Explanations for Deep Convolutional Networkscited by 939
- 2018Do Better ImageNet Models Transfer Better?cited by 565
- 2020On Translation Invariance in CNNs: Convolutional Layers can Exploit Absolute Spatial Locationcited by 142
- 2014A New 2.5D Representation for Lymph Node Detection using Random Sets of Deep Convolutional Neural Network Observationscited by 56
9 more
- 2020Bridging 2D and 3D Segmentation Networks for Computation Efficient Volumetric Medical Image Segmentation: An Empirical Study of 2.5D Solutionscited by 31
- 2024Foundation Models for Biomedical Image Segmentation: A Surveycited by 28
- 2020Which Model to Transfer? Finding the Needle in the Growing Haystackcited by 21
- 2021Mitigating the Bias of Centered Objects in Common Datasetscited by 7
- 2023Cross-dimensional transfer learning in medical image segmentation with deep learningcited by 4
- 2020Black-Box Saliency Map Generation Using Bayesian Optimisationcited by 3
- 2021Consistent Recurrent Neural Networks for 3D Neuron Segmentationcited by 3
- 2021A modular U-Net for automated segmentation of X-ray tomography images in composite materialscited by 3
- 2015Image-Based Correction of Continuous and Discontinuous Non-Planar Axial Distortion in Serial Section Microscopycited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.