Learning High-dimensional Ionic Model Dynamics Using Fourier Neural Operators
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Ionic models, described by systems of stiff ordinary differential equations, are fundamental tools for simulating the complex dynamics of excitable cells in both Computational Neuroscience and Cardiology. Approximating these models using Artificial Neural Networks poses significant challenges due to their inherent stiffness, multiscale nonlinearities, and the wide range of dynamical behaviors they exhibit, including multiple equilibrium points, limit cycles, and intricate interactions. While in previous studies the dynamics of the transmembrane potential has been predicted in low dimensionality settings, in the present study we extend these results by investigating whether Fourier Neural Operators can effectively learn the evolution of all the state variables within these dynamical systems in higher dimensions. We demonstrate the effectiveness of this approach by accurately learning the dynamics of three well-established ionic models with increasing dimensionality: the two-variable FitzHugh-Nagumo model, the four-variable Hodgkin-Huxley model, and the forty-one-variable O'Hara-Rudy model. To ensure the selection of near-optimal configurations for the Fourier Neural Operator, we conducted automatic hyperparameter tuning under two scenarios: an unconstrained setting, where the number of trainable parameters is not limited, and a constrained case with a fixed number of trainable parameters. Both constrained and unconstrained architectures achieve comparable results in terms of accuracy across all the models considered. However, the unconstrained architecture required approximately half the number of training epochs to achieve similar error levels, as evidenced by the loss function values recorded during training. These results underline the capabilities of Fourier Neural Operators to accurately capture complex multiscale dynamics, even in high-dimensional dynamical systems.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 May 2025.
Builds on
16 of 36 references.
References · 16
- 2020Fourier Neural Operator for Parametric Partial Differential Equationscited by 2,806
- 2019DeepONet: Learning nonlinear operators for identifying differential equations based on the universal approximation theorem of operatorscited by 1,965
- 2018On the Spectral Bias of Neural Networkscited by 1,321
- 2022Scientific Machine Learning through Physics-Informed Neural Networks: Where we are and What's nextcited by 603
- 2018Tune: A Research Platform for Distributed Model Selection and Trainingcited by 395
- 2024Transolver: A Fast Transformer Solver for PDEs on General Geometriescited by 299
- 2022Transformer for Partial Differential Equations' Operator Learningcited by 270
- 2023Neural Operators for Accelerating Scientific Simulations and Designcited by 218
- 2018A System for Massively Parallel Hyperparameter Tuningcited by 201
- 2022Physics-Informed Deep Neural Operator Networkscited by 110
- 2023Nonlocality and Nonlinearity Implies Universality in Operator Learningcited by 43
- 2024Continuum Attention for Neural Operatorscited by 39
4 more
- 2023LEONARDO: A Pan-European Pre-Exascale Supercomputer for HPC and AI Applicationscited by 12
- 2024Learning the Hodgkin-Huxley Model with Operator Learning Techniquescited by 10
- 2023Splitting physics-informed neural networks for inferring the dynamics of integer- and fractional-order neuron modelscited by 4
- 2025HyperNOs: Automated and Parallel Library for Neural Operators Researchcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
2 papers.