DecIF: Improving Instruction-Following through Meta-Decomposition
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Instruction-following has emerged as a crucial capability for large language models (LLMs). However, existing approaches often rely on pre-existing documents or external resources to synthesize instruction-following data, which limits their flexibility and generalizability. In this paper, we introduce DecIF, a fully autonomous, meta-decomposition guided framework that generates diverse and high-quality instruction-following data using only LLMs. DecIF is grounded in the principle of decomposition. For instruction generation, we guide LLMs to iteratively produce various types of meta-information, which are then combined with response constraints to form well-structured and semantically rich instructions. We further utilize LLMs to detect and resolve potential inconsistencies within the generated instructions. Regarding response generation, we decompose each instruction into atomic-level evaluation criteria, enabling rigorous validation and the elimination of inaccurate instruction-response pairs. Extensive experiments across a wide range of scenarios and settings demonstrate DecIF's superior performance on instruction-following tasks. Further analysis highlights its strong flexibility, scalability, and generalizability in automatically synthesizing high-quality instruction data.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 May 2025.
Builds on
22 of 40 references.
References · 22
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
- 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,320
- 2023Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttentioncited by 5,944
- 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,371
- 2019HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?cited by 4,100
- 2023Let's Verify Step by Stepcited by 3,789
- 2023GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmarkcited by 2,879
- 2022Self-Instruct: Aligning Language Models with Self-Generated Instructionscited by 2,724
- 2022Challenging BIG-Bench Tasks and Whether Chain-of-Thought Can Solve Themcited by 1,807
- 2024LlamaFactory: Unified Efficient Fine-Tuning of 100+ Language Modelscited by 1,464
- 2023Enhancing Chat Language Models by Scaling High-quality Instructional Conversationscited by 839
10 more
- 2024From Crowdsourced Data to High-Quality Benchmarks: Arena-Hard and BenchBuilder Pipelinecited by 500
- 2024Scaling Synthetic Data Creation with 1,000,000,000 Personascited by 417
- 2024Magpie: Alignment Data Synthesis from Scratch by Prompting Aligned LLMs with Nothingcited by 346
- 2024LiveBench: A Challenging, Contamination-Limited LLM Benchmarkcited by 262
- 2024IOPO: Empowering LLMs with Complex Instruction Following via Input-Output Preference Optimizationcited by 31
- 2025Condor: Enhance LLM Alignment with Knowledge-Driven Data Synthesis and Refinementcited by 18
- 2025MuSC: Improving Complex Instruction Following with Multi-granularity Self-Contrastive Trainingcited by 12
- 2025AIR: Complex Instruction Generation via Automatic Iterative Refinementcited by 10
- 2024From Instructions to Constraints: Language Model Alignment with Automatic Constraint Verificationcited by 8
- 2025FuseChat-3.0: Preference Optimization Meets Heterogeneous Model Fusioncited by 6
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.