mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Robust learning of halfspaces under log-concave marginals

arXiv 2505.13708 ↗First posted 19 May 2025cs.DS cs.LGcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We say that a classifier is adversarially robust to perturbations of norm r if, with high probability over a point x drawn from the input distribution, there is no point within distance ≤ r from x that is classified differently. The boundary volume is the probability that a point falls within distance r of a point with a different label. This work studies the task of computationally efficient learning of hypotheses with small boundary volume, where the input is distributed as a subgaussian isotropic log-concave distribution over ℝd. Linear threshold functions are adversarially robust; they have boundary volume proportional to r. Such concept classes are efficiently learnable by polynomial regression, which produces a polynomial threshold function (PTF), but PTFs in general may have boundary volume Omega(1), even for r ll 1. We give an algorithm that agnostically learns linear threshold functions and returns a classifier with boundary volume O(r+varepsilon) at radius of perturbation r. The time and sample complexity of d^tildeO(1/varepsilon2) matches the complexity of polynomial regression. Our algorithm augments the classic approach of polynomial regression with three additional steps: a) performing the ℓ1-error regression under noise sensitivity constraints, b) a structured partitioning and rounding step that returns a Boolean classifier with error textsfopt + O(varepsilon) and noise sensitivity O(r+varepsilon) simultaneously, and c) a local corrector that ``smooths'' a function with low noise sensitivity into a function that is adversarially robust.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 May 2025.

Builds on

20 of 37 references.

References · 20

  1. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
  2. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
  3. 2019Certified Adversarial Robustness via Randomized Smoothingcited by 1,324
  4. 2017Evasion Attacks against Machine Learning at Test Timecited by 686
  5. 2018Certified Robustness to Adversarial Examples with Differential Privacycited by 462
  6. 2019VC Classes are Adversarially Robustly Learnable, but Only Improperlycited by 83
  7. 2018Adversarial examples from computational constraintscited by 79
  8. 2022Planting Undetectable Backdoors in Machine Learning Modelscited by 55
  9. 2021The Optimality of Polynomial Regression for Agnostic Learning under Gaussian Marginalscited by 52
  10. 2017Learning Geometric Concepts with Nasty Noisecited by 46
  11. 2022A Moment-Matching Approach to Testable Learning and a New Characterization of Rademacher Complexitycited by 27
  12. 2019On the Hardness of Robust Classificationcited by 23
8 more
  1. 2020Efficiently Learning Adversarially Robust Halfspaces with Noisecited by 22
  2. 2014A PTAS for Agnostically Learning Halfspacescited by 21
  3. 2021Agnostic Proper Learning of Halfspaces under Gaussian Marginalscited by 21
  4. 2020The Complexity of Adversarially Robust Proper Learning of Halfspaces with Agnostic Noisecited by 15
  5. 2019On Robustness to Adversarial Examples and Polynomial Optimizationcited by 14
  6. 2019Computational Limitations in Robust Classification and Win-Win Resultscited by 10
  7. 2019Nearly Tight Bounds for Robust Proper Learning of Halfspaces with a Margincited by 8
  8. 2022Properly learning monotone functions via local reconstructioncited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

2 papers.