From What Ifs to Insights: Counterfactuals in Causal Inference vs. Explainable AI
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Counterfactuals play a pivotal role in the two distinct data science fields of causal inference (CI) and explainable artificial intelligence (XAI). While the core idea behind counterfactuals remains the same in both fields--the examination of what would have happened under different circumstances--there are key differences in how they are used and interpreted. We introduce a formal definition that encompasses the multi-faceted concept of the counterfactual in CI and XAI. We then discuss how counterfactuals are used, evaluated, generated, and operationalized in CI vs. XAI, highlighting conceptual and practical differences. By comparing and contrasting the two, we hope to identify opportunities for cross-fertilization across CI and XAI.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 May 2025.
Builds on
9 of 48 references.
References · 9
- 2017Counterfactual Explanations without Opening the Black Box: Automated Decisions and the GDPRcited by 1,089
- 2017Counterfactual Fairnesscited by 804
- 2016Recommendations as Treatments: Debiasing Learning and Evaluationcited by 248
- 2020Counterfactual Explanations and Algorithmic Recourses for Machine Learning: A Reviewcited by 174
- 2019Counterfactual Off-Policy Evaluation with Gumbel-Max Structural Causal Modelscited by 117
- 2017Interpretable Predictions of Tree-based Ensembles via Actionable Feature Tweakingcited by 76
- 2020One Explanation Does Not Fit All: The Promise of Interactive Explanations for Machine Learning Transparencycited by 64
- 2020Interpretable Off-Policy Evaluation in Reinforcement Learning by Highlighting Influential Transitionscited by 41
- 2020Explaining Data-Driven Decisions made by AI Systems: The Counterfactual Approachcited by 26
Built on by
Not cited yet.