mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Reconstructing Physics-Informed Machine Learning for Traffic Flow Modeling: a Multi-Gradient Descent and Pareto Learning Approach

arXiv 2505.13241 ↗First posted 19 May 2025cs.LG math.OC stat.MLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Physics-informed machine learning (PIML) is crucial in modern traffic flow modeling because it combines the benefits of both physics-based and data-driven approaches. In conventional PIML, physical information is typically incorporated by constructing a hybrid loss function that combines data-driven loss and physics loss through linear scalarization. The goal is to find a trade-off between these two objectives to improve the accuracy of model predictions. However, from a mathematical perspective, linear scalarization is limited to identifying only the convex region of the Pareto front, as it treats data-driven and physics losses as separate objectives. Given that most PIML loss functions are non-convex, linear scalarization restricts the achievable trade-off solutions. Moreover, tuning the weighting coefficients for the two loss components can be both time-consuming and computationally challenging. To address these limitations, this paper introduces a paradigm shift in PIML by reformulating the training process as a multi-objective optimization problem, treating data-driven loss and physics loss independently. We apply several multi-gradient descent algorithms (MGDAs), including traditional multi-gradient descent (TMGD) and dual cone gradient descent (DCGD), to explore the Pareto front in this multi-objective setting. These methods are evaluated on both macroscopic and microscopic traffic flow models. In the macroscopic case, MGDAs achieved comparable performance to traditional linear scalarization methods. Notably, in the microscopic case, MGDAs significantly outperformed their scalarization-based counterparts, demonstrating the advantages of a multi-objective optimization approach in complex PIML scenarios.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 May 2025.

Builds on

19 of 48 references.

References · 19

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  2. 2017Multi-Task Learning Using Uncertainty to Weigh Losses for Scene Geometry and Semanticscited by 1,358
  3. 2018Multi-Task Learning as Multi-Objective Optimizationcited by 821
  4. 2021Characterizing possible failure modes in physics-informed neural networkscited by 643
  5. 2018End-to-End Multi-Task Learning with Attentioncited by 534
  6. 2019Pareto Multi-Task Learningcited by 224
  7. 2018Traffic Graph Convolutional Recurrent Neural Network: A Deep Learning Framework for Network-Scale Traffic Learning and Forecastingcited by 146
  8. 2018Deep Bidirectional and Unidirectional LSTM Recurrent Neural Network for Network-wide Traffic Speed Predictioncited by 61
  9. 2020Efficient Continuous Pareto Exploration in Multi-Task Learningcited by 57
  10. 2022Pareto Set Learning for Expensive Multi-Objective Optimizationcited by 51
  11. 2022STDEN: Towards Physics-Guided Neural Networks for Traffic Flow Predictioncited by 45
  12. 2020A Physics-Informed Deep Learning Paradigm for Car-Following Modelscited by 41
7 more
  1. 2021A Physics-Informed Deep Learning Paradigm for Traffic State and Fundamental Diagram Estimationcited by 37
  2. 2020Macroscopic Traffic Flow Modeling with Physics Regularized Gaussian Process: A New Insight into Machine Learning Applicationscited by 25
  3. 2024Dual Cone Gradient Descent for Training Physics-Informed Neural Networkscited by 21
  4. 2021Short-term traffic prediction using physics-aware neural networkscited by 8
  5. 2020Modeling Stochastic Microscopic Traffic Behaviors: a Physics Regularized Gaussian Process Approachcited by 4
  6. 2023Physics-informed Machine Learning for Calibrating Macroscopic Traffic Flow Modelscited by 3
  7. 2025Potential failures of physics-informed machine learning in traffic flow modeling: theoretical and experimental analysiscited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.