UniEdit: A Unified Knowledge Editing Benchmark for Large Language Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Model editing aims to enhance the accuracy and reliability of large language models (LLMs) by efficiently adjusting their internal parameters. Currently, most LLM editing datasets are confined to narrow knowledge domains and cover a limited range of editing evaluation. They often overlook the broad scope of editing demands and the diversity of ripple effects resulting from edits. In this context, we introduce UniEdit, a unified benchmark for LLM editing grounded in open-domain knowledge. First, we construct editing samples by selecting entities from 25 common domains across five major categories, utilizing the extensive triple knowledge available in open-domain knowledge graphs to ensure comprehensive coverage of the knowledge domains. To address the issues of generality and locality in editing, we design an Neighborhood Multi-hop Chain Sampling (NMCS) algorithm to sample subgraphs based on a given knowledge piece to entail comprehensive ripple effects to evaluate. Finally, we employ proprietary LLMs to convert the sampled knowledge subgraphs into natural language text, guaranteeing grammatical accuracy and syntactical diversity. Extensive statistical analysis confirms the scale, comprehensiveness, and diversity of our UniEdit benchmark. We conduct comprehensive experiments across multiple LLMs and editors, analyzing their performance to highlight strengths and weaknesses in editing across open knowledge domains and various evaluation criteria, thereby offering valuable insights for future research endeavors.
Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 18 May 2025.
Builds on
0 of 0 references.
No references here yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 7.
10 papers.
- 2025ThinkEval: Practical Evaluation of Knowledge Leakage in LLM Editing using Thought-based Knowledge Graphscited by 4
- 2026Are We Evaluating the Edit Locality of LLM Model Editing Properly?cited by 4
- 2026From Backward Spreading to Forward Replay: Revisiting Target Construction in LLM Parameter Editingcited by 2
- 2026Scaling Laws for Hypernetwork-Based Knowledge Injection in Large Language Modelscited by 2
- 2025AutoGuard: A Self-Healing Proactive Security Layer for DevSecOps Pipelines Using Reinforcement Learningcited by 1
- 2026Reversible Lifelong Model Editing via Semantic Routing-Based LoRAcited by 1
- 2026EditPropBench: Measuring Factual Edit Propagation in Scientific Manuscriptscited by 1
- 2026Benchmarking Safety Risks of Knowledge-Intensive Reasoning under Malicious Knowledge Editingcited by 1
- 2025An Information-Theoretic Framework for Robust Large Language Model Editingcited by 0
- 2026MedKIT: Evaluating Knowledge Integration and Generalization in Large Language Modelscited by 0
- 2026MedKIT: Evaluating Knowledge Integration and Generalization in Large Language Models29 Sep 2026
- 2026Scaling Laws for Hypernetwork-Based Knowledge Injection in Large Language Models21 Jul 2026
- 2026Benchmarking Safety Risks of Knowledge-Intensive Reasoning under Malicious Knowledge Editing11 May 2026
- 2026EditPropBench: Measuring Factual Edit Propagation in Scientific Manuscripts3 May 2026
- 2026From Backward Spreading to Forward Replay: Revisiting Target Construction in LLM Parameter Editing1 May 2026
- 2026Reversible Lifelong Model Editing via Semantic Routing-Based LoRA11 Mar 2026
- 2026Are We Evaluating the Edit Locality of LLM Model Editing Properly?24 Jan 2026
- 2025An Information-Theoretic Framework for Robust Large Language Model Editing18 Dec 2025
- 2025AutoGuard: A Self-Healing Proactive Security Layer for DevSecOps Pipelines Using Reinforcement Learning4 Dec 2025
- 2025ThinkEval: Practical Evaluation of Knowledge Leakage in LLM Editing using Thought-based Knowledge Graphs2 Jun 2025