mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Distribution Prompting: Understanding the Expressivity of Language Models Through the Next-Token Distributions They Can Produce

arXiv 2505.12244 ↗First posted 18 May 2025cs.CLcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Autoregressive neural language models (LMs) generate a probability distribution over tokens at each time step given a prompt. In this work, we attempt to systematically understand the probability distributions that LMs can produce, showing that some distributions are significantly harder to elicit than others. Specifically, for any target next-token distribution over the vocabulary, we attempt to find a prompt that induces the LM to output a distribution as close as possible to the target, using either soft or hard gradient-based prompt tuning. We find that (1) in general, distributions with very low or very high entropy are easier to approximate than those with moderate entropy; (2) among distributions with the same entropy, those containing ''outlier tokens'' are easier to approximate; (3) target distributions generated by LMs -- even LMs with different tokenizers -- are easier to approximate than randomly chosen targets. These results offer insights into the expressiveness of LMs and the challenges of using them as probability distribution proposers.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 May 2025.

Builds on

21 of 36 references.

References · 21

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  3. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
  4. 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,586
  5. 2021Prefix-Tuning: Optimizing Continuous Prompts for Generationcited by 3,915
  6. 2013Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionalitycited by 3,474
  7. 2019The Curious Case of Neural Text Degenerationcited by 2,916
  8. 2020Making Pre-trained Language Models Better Few-shot Learnerscited by 1,256
  9. 2019Universal Adversarial Triggers for Attacking and Analyzing NLPcited by 722
  10. 2020It's Not Just Size That Matters: Small Language Models Are Also Few-Shot Learnerscited by 669
  11. 2023The Falcon Series of Open Language Modelscited by 535
  12. 2020How Can We Know When Language Models Know? On the Calibration of Language Models for Question Answeringcited by 445
9 more
  1. 2021Learning How to Ask: Querying LMs with Mixtures of Soft Promptscited by 377
  2. 2021ERNIE 3.0: Large-scale Knowledge Enhanced Pre-training for Language Understanding and Generationcited by 260
  3. 2019ScispaCy: Fast and Robust Models for Biomedical Natural Language Processingcited by 244
  4. 2017Breaking the Softmax Bottleneck: A High-Rank RNN Language Modelcited by 152
  5. 2021BERTese: Learning to Speak to BERTcited by 82
  6. 2023Language Model Inversioncited by 68
  7. 2018Towards Understanding Linear Word Analogiescited by 57
  8. 2024Logits of API-Protected LLMs Leak Proprietary Informationcited by 40
  9. 2023Closing the Curious Case of Neural Text Degenerationcited by 32

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.