mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Multi-Attribute Graph Estimation with Sparse-Group Non-Convex Penalties

arXiv 2505.11984 ↗First posted 17 May 2025stat.ML cs.LG eess.SPcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We consider the problem of inferring the conditional independence graph (CIG) of high-dimensional Gaussian vectors from multi-attribute data. Most existing methods for graph estimation are based on single-attribute models where one associates a scalar random variable with each node. In multi-attribute graphical models, each node represents a random vector. In this paper we provide a unified theoretical analysis of multi-attribute graph learning using a penalized log-likelihood objective function. We consider both convex (sparse-group lasso) and sparse-group non-convex (log-sum and smoothly clipped absolute deviation (SCAD) penalties) penalty/regularization functions. An alternating direction method of multipliers (ADMM) approach coupled with local linear approximation to non-convex penalties is presented for optimization of the objective function. For non-convex penalties, theoretical analysis establishing local consistency in support recovery, local convexity and precision matrix estimation in high-dimensional settings is provided under two sets of sufficient conditions: with and without some irrepresentability conditions. We illustrate our approaches using both synthetic and real-data numerical examples. In the synthetic data examples the sparse-group log-sum penalized objective function significantly outperformed the lasso penalized as well as SCAD penalized objective functions with F1-score and Hamming distance as performance metrics.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 May 2025.

Builds on

7 of 32 references.

References · 7

  1. 2021Convex optimizationcited by 2,515
  2. 2013Regularized M-estimators with nonconvexity: Statistical and algorithmic theory for local optimacited by 66
  3. 2014Support recovery without incoherence: A case for nonconvex regularizationcited by 25
  4. 2020FuDGE: A Method to Estimate a Functional Differential Graph in a High-Dimensional Settingcited by 7
  5. 2021Sparse Graph Learning Under Laplacian-Related Constraintscited by 5
  6. 2022Sparse-Group Log-Sum Penalized Graphical Model Learning For Time Seriescited by 5
  7. 2023Learning High-Dimensional Differential Graphs From Multi-Attribute Datacited by 3

Built on by

Not cited yet.