mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Enhancing Complex Instruction Following for Large Language Models with Mixture-of-Contexts Fine-tuning

arXiv 2505.11922 ↗First posted 17 May 2025cs.CLcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models (LLMs) exhibit remarkable capabilities in handling natural language tasks; however, they may struggle to consistently follow complex instructions including those involve multiple constraints. Post-training LLMs using supervised fine-tuning (SFT) is a standard approach to improve their ability to follow instructions. In addressing complex instruction following, existing efforts primarily focus on data-driven methods that synthesize complex instruction-output pairs for SFT. However, insufficient attention allocated to crucial sub-contexts may reduce the effectiveness of SFT. In this work, we propose transforming sequentially structured input instruction into multiple parallel instructions containing subcontexts. To support processing this multi-input, we propose MISO (Multi-Input Single-Output), an extension to currently dominant decoder-only transformer-based LLMs. MISO introduces a mixture-of-contexts paradigm that jointly considers the overall instruction-output alignment and the influence of individual sub-contexts to enhance SFT effectiveness. We apply MISO fine-tuning to complex instructionfollowing datasets and evaluate it with standard LLM inference. Empirical results demonstrate the superiority of MISO as a fine-tuning method for LLMs, both in terms of effectiveness in complex instruction-following scenarios and its potential for training efficiency.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 May 2025.

Builds on

22 of 25 references.

References · 22

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
  3. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 8,065
  4. 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 6,330
  5. 2022Self-Instruct: Aligning Language Models with Self-Generated Instructionscited by 2,724
  6. 2023Efficient Streaming Language Models with Attention Sinkscited by 2,186
  7. 2023Instruction-Following Evaluation for Large Language Modelscited by 1,228
  8. 2020Leveraging Passage Retrieval with Generative Models for Open Domain Question Answeringcited by 1,210
  9. 2023WizardLM: Empowering large pre-trained language models to follow complex instructionscited by 1,125
  10. 2023Instruction Tuning for Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 623
  11. 2023Zephyr: Direct Distillation of LM Alignmentcited by 506
  12. 2023What Makes Good Data for Alignment? A Comprehensive Study of Automatic Data Selection in Instruction Tuningcited by 364
10 more
  1. 2023From Quantity to Quality: Boosting LLM Performance with Self-Guided Data Selection for Instruction Tuningcited by 307
  2. 2025MoBA: Mixture of Block Attention for Long-Context LLMscited by 198
  3. 2024Benchmarking Complex Instruction-Following with Multiple Constraints Compositioncited by 152
  4. 2022Parallel Context Windows for Large Language Modelscited by 81
  5. 2024Training-Free Long-Context Scaling of Large Language Modelscited by 62
  6. 2024Conifer: Improving Complex Constrained Instruction-Following Ability of Large Language Modelscited by 27
  7. 2025Order Matters: Investigate the Position Bias in Multi-constraint Instruction Followingcited by 12
  8. 2024RuleR: Improving LLM Controllability by Rule-based Data Recyclingcited by 11
  9. 2024Constraint Back-translation Improves Complex Instruction Following of Large Language Modelscited by 11
  10. 2024Order-Independence Without Fine Tuningcited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

2 papers.