mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

HARDMath2: A Benchmark for Applied Mathematics Built by Students as Part of a Graduate Class

arXiv 2505.11774 ↗First posted 17 May 2025cs.LG cs.AIcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models (LLMs) have shown remarkable progress in mathematical problem-solving, but evaluation has largely focused on problems that have exact analytical solutions or involve formal proofs, often overlooking approximation-based problems ubiquitous in applied science and engineering. To fill this gap, we build on prior work and present HARDMath2, a dataset of 211 original problems covering the core topics in an introductory graduate applied math class, including boundary-layer analysis, WKB methods, asymptotic solutions of nonlinear partial differential equations, and the asymptotics of oscillatory integrals. This dataset was designed and verified by the students and instructors of a core graduate applied mathematics course at Harvard. We build the dataset through a novel collaborative environment that challenges students to write and refine difficult problems consistent with the class syllabus, peer-validate solutions, test different models, and automatically check LLM-generated solutions against their own answers and numerical ground truths. Evaluation results show that leading frontier models still struggle with many of the problems in the dataset, highlighting a gap in the mathematical reasoning skills of current LLMs. Importantly, students identified strategies to create increasingly difficult problems by interacting with the models and exploiting common failure modes. This back-and-forth with the models not only resulted in a richer and more challenging benchmark but also led to qualitative improvements in the students' understanding of the course material, which is increasingly important as we enter an age where state-of-the-art language models can solve many challenging problems across a wide domain of fields.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 21 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 May 2025.

Builds on

9 of 21 references.

References · 9

  1. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
  2. 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,371
  3. 2025s1: Simple test-time scalingcited by 1,341
  4. 2023Mathematical Capabilities of ChatGPTcited by 268
  5. 2024FrontierMath: A Benchmark for Evaluating Advanced Mathematical Reasoning in AIcited by 243
  6. 2025Proof or Bluff? Evaluating LLMs on 2025 USA Math Olympiadcited by 74
  7. 2023ARB: Advanced Reasoning Benchmark for Large Language Modelscited by 60
  8. 2025Theoretical Physics Benchmark (TPBench) -- a Dataset and Study of AI Reasoning Capabilities in Theoretical Physicscited by 34
  9. 2024HARDMath: A Benchmark Dataset for Challenging Problems in Applied Mathematicscited by 32

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 3.

5 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026The CompMath-MCQ Dataset: Are LLMs Ready for Higher-Level Math?
  2. 2025UGMathBench: A Diverse and Dynamic Benchmark for Undergraduate-Level Mathematical Reasoning with Large Language Models
  3. 2024FineMath: A Fine-Grained Mathematical Evaluation Benchmark for Chinese Large Language Models
  4. 2025DeepMath-Creative: A Benchmark for Evaluating Mathematical Creativity of Large Language Models
  5. 2024Large Language Models for Mathematical Analysis
  6. 2025RealMath: A Continuous Benchmark for Evaluating Language Models on Research-Level Mathematics
  7. 2026CrowdMath: A Dataset of Crowdsourced Mathematical Research Discussions
  8. 2026AdvancedMathBench: A Benchmark Suite for Advanced Mathematical Proof Generation and Verification