ASR-FAIRBENCH: Measuring and Benchmarking Equity Across Speech Recognition Systems
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) systems have become ubiquitous in everyday applications, yet significant disparities in performance across diverse demographic groups persist. In this work, we introduce the ASR-FAIRBENCH leaderboard which is designed to assess both the accuracy and equity of ASR models in real-time. Leveraging the Meta's Fair-Speech dataset, which captures diverse demographic characteristics, we employ a mixed-effects Poisson regression model to derive an overall fairness score. This score is integrated with traditional metrics like Word Error Rate (WER) to compute the Fairness Adjusted ASR Score (FAAS), providing a comprehensive evaluation framework. Our approach reveals significant performance disparities in SOTA ASR models across demographic groups and offers a benchmark to drive the development of more inclusive ASR technologies.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 3 of its 6 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 May 2025.
Builds on
3 of 6 references.
References · 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 4.
4 papers.
- 2026VoxSafeBench: Not Just What Is Said, but Who, How, and Wherecited by 8
- 2026Where Do Self-Supervised Speech Models Become Unfair?cited by 1
- 2026ACES: Accent Subspaces for Coupling, Explanations, and Stress-Testing in Automatic Speech Recognitioncited by 0
- 2026Fairness Beyond a Single Run: Training-Seed Variability in Speech LLM Adaptationcited by 0
- 2026Fairness Beyond a Single Run: Training-Seed Variability in Speech LLM Adaptation30 Sep 2026
- 2026Where Do Self-Supervised Speech Models Become Unfair?20 Apr 2026
- 2026VoxSafeBench: Not Just What Is Said, but Who, How, and Where16 Apr 2026
- 2026ACES: Accent Subspaces for Coupling, Explanations, and Stress-Testing in Automatic Speech Recognition28 Feb 2026