mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Modeling cognitive processes of natural reading with transformer-based Language Models

arXiv 2505.11485 ↗First posted 16 May 2025cs.CL cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recent advances in Natural Language Processing (NLP) have led to the development of highly sophisticated language models for text generation. In parallel, neuroscience has increasingly employed these models to explore cognitive processes involved in language comprehension. Previous research has shown that models such as N-grams and LSTM networks can partially account for predictability effects in explaining eye movement behaviors, specifically Gaze Duration, during reading. In this study, we extend these findings by evaluating transformer-based models (GPT2, LLaMA-7B, and LLaMA2-7B) to further investigate this relationship. Our results indicate that these architectures outperform earlier models in explaining the variance in Gaze Durations recorded from Rioplantense Spanish readers. However, similar to previous studies, these models still fail to account for the entirety of the variance captured by human predictability. These findings suggest that, despite their advancements, state-of-the-art language models continue to predict language in ways that differ from human readers.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 May 2025.

Builds on

7 of 30 references.

References · 7

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  3. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  4. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 14,132
  5. 2017Regularizing and Optimizing LSTM Language Modelscited by 205
  6. 2019Interpreting and improving natural-language processing (in machines) with natural language-processing (in the brain)cited by 128
  7. 2022Language Models Explain Word Reading Times Better Than Empirical Predictabilitycited by 9

Built on by

Not cited yet.