mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Preference Isolation Forest for Structure-based Anomaly Detection

arXiv 2505.10876 ↗First posted 16 May 2025cs.LG cs.AI cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We address the problem of detecting anomalies as samples that do not conform to structured patterns represented by low-dimensional manifolds. To this end, we conceive a general anomaly detection framework called Preference Isolation Forest (PIF), that combines the benefits of adaptive isolation-based methods with the flexibility of preference embedding. The key intuition is to embed the data into a high-dimensional preference space by fitting low-dimensional manifolds, and to identify anomalies as isolated points. We propose three isolation approaches to identify anomalies: i) Voronoi-iForest, the most general solution, ii) RuzHash-iForest, that avoids explicit computation of distances via Local Sensitive Hashing, and iii) Sliding-PIF, that leverages a locality prior to improve efficiency and effectiveness.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 May 2025.

Builds on

9 of 47 references.

References · 9

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  2. 2021The MVTec 3D-AD Dataset for Unsupervised 3D Anomaly Detection and Localizationcited by 178
  3. 2018Extended Isolation Forestcited by 81
  4. 2022Calibrated One-class Classification for Unsupervised Time Series Anomaly Detectioncited by 40
  5. 2024Deep Graph Anomaly Detection: A Survey and New Perspectivescited by 40
  6. 2024PointAD: Comprehending 3D Anomalies from Points and Pixels for Zero-shot 3D Anomaly Detectioncited by 29
  7. 2019Functional Isolation Forestcited by 19
  8. 2024Towards Zero-shot Point Cloud Anomaly Detection: A Multi-View Projection Frameworkcited by 15
  9. 2025PIF: Anomaly detection via preference embeddingcited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.