A multi-head deep fusion model for recognition of cattle foraging events using sound and movement signals
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Monitoring feeding behaviour is a relevant task for efficient herd management and the effective use of available resources in grazing cattle. The ability to automatically recognise animals' feeding activities through the identification of specific jaw movements allows for the improvement of diet formulation, as well as early detection of metabolic problems and symptoms of animal discomfort, among other benefits. The use of sensors to obtain signals for such monitoring has become popular in the last two decades. The most frequently employed sensors include accelerometers, microphones, and cameras, each with its own set of advantages and drawbacks. An unexplored aspect is the simultaneous use of multiple sensors with the aim of combining signals in order to enhance the precision of the estimations. In this direction, this work introduces a deep neural network based on the fusion of acoustic and inertial signals, composed of convolutional, recurrent, and dense layers. The main advantage of this model is the combination of signals through the automatic extraction of features independently from each of them. The model has emerged from an exploration and comparison of different neural network architectures proposed in this work, which carry out information fusion at different levels. Feature-level fusion has outperformed data and decision-level fusion by at least a 0.14 based on the F1-score metric. Moreover, a comparison with state-of-the-art machine learning methods is presented, including traditional and deep learning approaches. The proposed model yielded an F1-score value of 0.802, representing a 14% increase compared to previous methods. Finally, results from an ablation study and post-training quantization evaluation are also reported.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 68 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 May 2025.
Builds on
8 of 68 references.
References · 8
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
- 2014Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translationcited by 4,057
- 2017End-to-End Multimodal Emotion Recognition using Deep Neural Networkscited by 70
- 2021Sound Event Detection: A Tutorialcited by 51
- 2015Deep Multimodal Learning for Audio-Visual Speech Recognitioncited by 38
- 2021You Only Hear Once: A YOLO-like Algorithm for Audio Segmentation and Sound Event Detectioncited by 10
- 2022Multimodal sensor data fusion for in-situ classification of animal behavior using accelerometry and GNSS datacited by 10
- 2023Livestock feeding behaviour: A review on automated systems for ruminant monitoringcited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Toward Optimal Sampling Rate Selection and Unbiased Classification for Precise Animal Activity Recognition
- 2025AI in Agriculture: A Survey of Deep Learning Techniques for Crops, Fisheries and Livestock
- 2026Lightweight Distillation of SAM 3 and DINOv3 for Edge-Deployable Individual-Level Livestock Monitoring and Longitudinal Visual Analytics
- 2022In-situ animal behavior classification using knowledge distillation and fixed-point quantization
- 2025When Language Model Guides Vision: Grounding DINO for Cattle Muzzle Detection
- 2024GPT-4o: Visual perception performance of multimodal large language models in piglet activity understanding
- 2025Policy-Driven Transfer Learning in Resource-Limited Animal Monitoring
- 2025ViLLa: A Neuro-Symbolic approach for Animal Monitoring