Detecting Sybil Addresses in Blockchain Airdrops: A Subgraph-based Feature Propagation and Fusion Approach
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Sybil attacks pose a significant security threat to blockchain ecosystems, particularly in token airdrop events. This paper proposes a novel sybil address identification method based on subgraph feature extraction lightGBM. The method first constructs a two-layer deep transaction subgraph for each address, then extracts key event operation features according to the lifecycle of sybil addresses, including the time of first transaction, first gas acquisition, participation in airdrop activities, and last transaction. These temporal features effectively capture the consistency of sybil address behavior operations. Additionally, the method extracts amount and network structure features, comprehensively describing address behavior patterns and network topology through feature propagation and fusion. Experiments conducted on a dataset containing 193,701 addresses (including 23,240 sybil addresses) show that this method outperforms existing approaches in terms of precision, recall, F1 score, and AUC, with all metrics exceeding 0.9. The methods and results of this study can be further applied to broader blockchain security areas such as transaction manipulation identification and token liquidity risk assessment, contributing to the construction of a more secure and fair blockchain ecosystem.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 22 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 May 2025.
Builds on
8 of 22 references.
References · 8
- 2019Who Are the Phishers? Phishing Scam Detection on Ethereum via Network Embeddingcited by 38
- 2020Modeling and Understanding Ethereum Transaction Records via a Complex Network Approachcited by 11
- 2019Characterizing and Detecting Money Laundering Activities on the Bitcoin Networkcited by 9
- 2022Ethereum Fraud Detection with Heterogeneous Graph Neural Networkscited by 9
- 2018Characterizing Entities in the Bitcoin Blockchaincited by 6
- 2018A Probabilistic Model of the Bitcoin Blockchaincited by 1
- 2019Empirically Analyzing Ethereum's Gas Mechanismcited by 1
- 2022Fighting Sybils in Airdropscited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 4.
4 papers.
- 2026Can Trustless Agents Be Trusted? An Empirical Study of the ERC-8004 Decentralized AI Agent Ecosystemcited by 2
- 2026How Agentic Is Agentic Commerce? A Population-Scale Measurement of x402 Adoption and Authenticitycited by 2
- 2026Modeling Decisions in Blockchain Analytics: A Leakage-Aware Evaluation of Tree-Based vs. Sequential Modelscited by 0
- 2026Compression-Based Behavioral Similarity for Open-World Sybil Discovery on Ethereumcited by 0
- 2026Compression-Based Behavioral Similarity for Open-World Sybil Discovery on Ethereum29 Jul 2026
- 2026Modeling Decisions in Blockchain Analytics: A Leakage-Aware Evaluation of Tree-Based vs. Sequential Models29 Jul 2026
- 2026How Agentic Is Agentic Commerce? A Population-Scale Measurement of x402 Adoption and Authenticity14 Jul 2026
- 2026Can Trustless Agents Be Trusted? An Empirical Study of the ERC-8004 Decentralized AI Agent Ecosystem24 Jun 2026