mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Enhanced Photonic Chip Design via Interpretable Machine Learning Techniques

arXiv 2505.09266 ↗First posted 14 May 2025physics.optics cs.LG quant-phcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Photonic chip design has seen significant advancements with the adoption of inverse design methodologies, offering flexibility and efficiency in optimizing device performance. However, the black-box nature of the optimization approaches, such as those used in inverse design in order to minimize a loss function or maximize coupling efficiency, poses challenges in understanding the outputs. This challenge is prevalent in machine learning-based optimization methods, which can suffer from the same lack of transparency. To this end, interpretability techniques address the opacity of optimization models. In this work, we apply interpretability techniques from machine learning, with the aim of gaining understanding of inverse design optimization used in designing photonic components, specifically two-mode multiplexers. We base our methodology on the widespread interpretability technique known as local interpretable model-agnostic explanations, or LIME. As a result, LIME-informed insights point us to more effective initial conditions, directly improving device performance. This demonstrates that interpretability methods can do more than explain models -- they can actively guide and enhance the inverse-designed photonic components. Our results demonstrate the ability of interpretable techniques to reveal underlying patterns in the inverse design process, leading to the development of better-performing components.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 15 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 May 2025.

Builds on

7 of 15 references.

References · 7

  1. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
  2. 2017Towards A Rigorous Science of Interpretable Machine Learningcited by 1,416
  3. 2015An Introduction to Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 514
  4. 2019Fooling LIME and SHAP: Adversarial Attacks on Post hoc Explanation Methodscited by 443
  5. 2018On the Robustness of Interpretability Methodscited by 314
  6. 2018Defining Locality for Surrogates in Post-hoc Interpretablitycited by 33
  7. 2024Data-efficient and Interpretable Inverse Materials Design using a Disentangled Variational Autoencodercited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.