Understanding molecular ratios in the carbon and oxygen poor outer Milky Way with interpretable machine learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Context. The outer Milky Way has a lower metallicity than our solar neighbourhood, but still many molecules are detected in the region. Molecular line ratios can serve as probes to better understand the chemistry and physics in these regions. Aims. We use interpretable machine learning to study 9 different molecular ratios, helping us understand the forward connection between the physics of these environments and the carbon and oxygen chemistries. Methods. Using a large grid of astrochemical models generated using UCLCHEM, we study the properties of molecular clouds of low oxygen and carbon initial abundance. We first try to understand the line ratios using a classical analysis. We then move on to using interpretable machine learning, namely Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP), to understand the higher order dependencies of the ratios over the entire parameter grid. Lastly we use the Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection technique (UMAP) as a reduction method to create intuitive groupings of models. Results. We find that the parameter space is well covered by the line ratios, allowing us to investigate all input parameters. SHAP analysis shows that the temperature and density are the most important features, but the carbon and oxygen abundances are important in parts of the parameter space. Lastly, we find that we can group different types of ratios using UMAP. Conclusions. We show the chosen ratios are mostly sensitive to changes in the carbon initial abundance, together with the temperature and density. Especially the CN/HCN and HNC/HCN ratio are shown to be sensitive to the initial carbon abundance, making them excellent probes for this parameter. Out of the ratios, only CS/SO shows a sensitivity to the oxygen abundance.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 20 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 May 2025.
Builds on
4 of 20 references.
References · 4
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
- 2018UMAP: Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection for Dimension Reductioncited by 2,898
- 2019Explaining Models by Propagating Shapley Values of Local Componentscited by 29
- 2019Correlation of Auroral Dynamics and GNSS Scintillation with an Autoencodercited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.